Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress

被引:947
作者
Baumert, Juergen [1 ]
Kunter, Mareike
Blum, Werner [2 ]
Brunner, Martin [3 ]
Voss, Thamar
Jordan, Alexander [4 ]
Klusmann, Uta
Krauss, Stefan [2 ]
Neubrand, Michael [5 ]
Tsai, Yi-Miau [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Educ Res, Max Planck Inst Human Dev, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Kassel, Germany
[3] Univ Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[4] Univ Bielefeld, D-4800 Bielefeld, Germany
[5] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, D-2900 Oldenburg, Germany
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
teacher knowledge; teacher education; mathematics; instruction; cognitive activation; hierarchical modeling with latent variables; SUBJECT-MATTER KNOWLEDGE; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; NO CHILD LEFT; TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; COMPLEXITIES; INSTRUCTION; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.3102/0002831209345157
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students' learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 180
页数:48
相关论文
共 132 条
[51]   Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement [J].
Goldhaber, DD ;
Brewer, DJ .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2000, 22 (02) :129-145
[52]  
Goodson I., 1996, STUDYING SCH SUBJECT
[53]  
Goodson I.F., 1998, SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE RE
[54]  
Greeno J. G., 1996, HDB ED PSYCHOL, P15, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2
[55]  
Grossman P., 2005, PREPARING TEACHERS C, P201
[56]  
Grossman P.L., 1995, INT ENCY TEACHING TE, V2nd, P20
[57]   Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education [J].
Grossman, Pam ;
McDonald, Morva .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2008, 45 (01) :184-205
[58]   Respondng to our critics - From crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education [J].
Grossman, Pam .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 59 (01) :10-23
[59]  
Harbison Ralph., 1992, Educational Performance of the Poor
[60]  
Heaton R.M., 2000, TEACHING MATH NEW ST