Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation

被引:762
作者
Aven, Terje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Risk assessment; Risk management; Foundational issues; Review; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK; DEEP UNCERTAINTIES; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; BLACK SWANS; SAFETY; MODEL; RESILIENCE; ISSUES; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Risk assessment and management was established as a scientific field some 30-40 years ago. Principles and methods were developed for how to conceptualise, assess and manage risk. These principles and methods still represent to a large extent the foundation of this field today, but many advances have been made, linked to both the theoretical platform and practical models and procedures. The purpose of the present invited paper is to perform a review of these advances, with a special focus on the fundamental ideas and thinking on which these are based. We have looked for trends in perspectives and approaches, and we also reflect on where further development of the risk field is needed and should be encouraged. The paper is written for readers with different types of background, not only for experts on risk. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 152 条
[81]   Perspectives on risk and the unforeseen [J].
Haugen, Stein ;
Vinnem, Jan Erik .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 137 :1-5
[82]   A critical review on supply chain risk - Definition, measure and modeling [J].
Heckmann, Iris ;
Comes, Tina ;
Nickel, Stefan .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 52 :119-132
[83]  
Henley E.J., 1981, RELIABILITY ENG RISK
[84]  
Hertz D.B., 1983, RISK ANAL ITS APPL
[85]   About the applicability of MCDA to some robustness problems [J].
Hites, R. ;
De Smet, Y. ;
Risse, N. ;
Salazar-Neumann, M. ;
Vincke, P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) :322-332
[86]  
Hollnagel E., 2004, BARRIERS ACCIDENT PR
[87]   Is safety a subject for science? [J].
Hollnagel, Erik .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :21-24
[88]   Issues in safety science [J].
Hopkins, Andrew .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 67 :6-14
[89]  
ISO, 2009, GUIDE, V73, P2009
[90]   ALARP-What does it really mean? [J].
Jones-Lee, M. ;
Aven, T. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (08) :877-882