Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms

被引:39
作者
Skaane, Per
Kshirsagar, Ashwini
Stapleton, Sandra
Young, Kari
Castellino, Ronald A.
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] R2 Technol, Santa Clara, CA USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; computer-aided detection; digital images; mammography; screening;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.2207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and potential contribution of computer-aided detection ( CAD) to independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cases of 3,683 women who underwent both screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with independent double reading for each technique were followed for 2 years to include cancers detected in the interval between screening rounds and cancers detected at the next screening round. Fifty-five biopsy-proven cancers were diagnosed. The baseline screening mammograms of the 55 cancers were defined as having positive findings if at least one of two independent readers scored it 2 or higher on a 5-point rating scale. The baseline mammograms of interval ( n = 10) or second-round ( n = 16) cancers were retrospectively classified as overlooked ( n = 2), minimal sign actionable ( n = 8), minimal sign nonactionable ( n = 5), and normal ( n = 11). The baseline mammograms of these cases of cancer were evaluated with a CAD system, and the CAD results were compared (McNemar's test for paired proportions) with the findings at prospective independent double reading of mammograms obtained with each technique. RESULTS. For FFDM, CAD sensitivity was 95% (37/39) compared with 64% (25/39) for double reading ( p = 0.006), and for screen-film mammography, CAD sensitivity was 85% (33/39) compared with 77% (30/39) for prospective double reading ( p = 0.57) of radiographically visible lesions in baseline mammograms. CAD correctly marked five (13%) of 39 cancers on screen-film mammography and 14 (36%) of 39 cancers on FFDM not detected at prospective independent double reading. CONCLUSION. CAD showed the potential to increase the cancer detection rate for FFDM and for screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening performed with independent double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review [J].
Dinnes, J ;
Moss, S ;
Melia, J ;
Blanks, R ;
Song, F ;
Kleijnen, J .
BREAST, 2001, 10 (06) :455-463
[12]   VARIABILITY IN RADIOLOGISTS INTERPRETATIONS OF MAMMOGRAMS [J].
ELMORE, JG ;
WELLS, CK ;
LEE, CH ;
HOWARD, DH ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (22) :1493-1499
[13]  
EVANS WP, 2004, RADIOLOGY, V231, P564
[14]   Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system [J].
Feig, SA ;
Sickles, EA ;
Evans, WP ;
Linver, MN .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (16) :1260-1261
[15]   Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography [J].
Fischer, U ;
Baum, F ;
Obenauer, S ;
Luftner-Nagel, S ;
von Heyden, D ;
Vosshenrich, R ;
Grabbe, E .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (11) :2679-2683
[16]   Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center [J].
Freer, TW ;
Ulissey, MJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :781-786
[17]   Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system [J].
Gur, D ;
Sumkin, JH ;
Rockette, HE ;
Ganott, M ;
Hakim, C ;
Hardesty, L ;
Poller, WR ;
Shah, R ;
Wallace, L .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (03) :185-190
[18]   Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: Retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program [J].
Hofvind, S ;
Skaane, P ;
Vitak, B ;
Wang, H ;
Thoresen, S ;
Eriksen, L ;
Bjorndal, H ;
Braaten, A ;
Bjurstam, N .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (02) :437-443
[19]   Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography [J].
Ikeda, DM ;
Birdwell, RL ;
O'Shaughnessy, KF ;
Sickles, EA ;
Brenner, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :811-819
[20]   Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications [J].
Jiang, YL ;
Nishikawa, RM ;
Schmidt, RA ;
Toledano, AY ;
Doi, K .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :787-794