Employee-driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation

被引:198
作者
Kesting, Peter [1 ]
Ulhoi, John Parm [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus Sch Business, Dept Management, Ctr Org Renewal & Evolut, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Innovation; Employees participation; Decision making; Organizational culture; Human capital; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; WORK-ENVIRONMENT; CREATIVITY; TEAMS; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP; DISCOVERY; SUPPORT; CLIMATE; VIEW;
D O I
10.1108/00251741011014463
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to outline the "grand structure" of the phenomenon in order to identify both the underlying processes and core drivers of employee-driven innovation (EDI). Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual paper. It particularly applies the insights of contemporary research on routine and organizational decision making to the specific case of EDI. Findings - The main result of the paper is that, from a theoretical point of view, it makes perfect sense to involve ordinary employees in innovation decisions. However, it is also outlined that naive or ungoverned participation is counterproductive, and that it is quite difficult to realize the hidden potential in a supportive way. Research limitations/implications - The main implication is that basic mechanisms for employee participation also apply to innovation decisions, although often in a different way. However, the paper only identifies the grand structure of the phenomenon. The different identified drivers have to be further elaborated and empirically tested. Practical implications - EDI is a helpful tool to gain competitive advantage by utilizing the knowledge and creative potential of employees. Originality/value - This is the first paper that gives a systematic overview of the grand structure of EDI and derives the most important moderating factors from that.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 84
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Schatzel, EA ;
Moneta, GB ;
Kramer, SJ .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (01) :5-32
[2]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[3]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[4]  
[Anonymous], MCLEAN HOSP J
[5]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGY LEADERSHIP
[6]  
Bakker A.B., 2008, CAREER DEV INT, V13, P209, DOI [10.1108/13620430810870476, DOI 10.1108/13620430810870476]
[7]   Impact of work teams on manufacturing performance: A longitudinal field study [J].
Banker, RD ;
Field, JM ;
Schroeder, RG ;
Sinha, KK .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (04) :867-890
[8]  
Barnard C.I., 1968, FUNCT EXECUTIVE, V11
[9]  
Bazerman MaxH., 1998, JUDGMENT MANAGERIAL
[10]   High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement [J].
Bessant, J ;
Caffyn, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1997, 14 (01) :7-28