Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology

被引:88
作者
Chang, Kuei-Hu [1 ]
机构
[1] ROC Mil Acad, Dept Management Sci, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; MODE; OWA; RELIABILITY; FMEA; PRIORITIZATION; OPERATORS; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.microrel.2009.07.057
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Risk assessment is a preventive analysis task of product design and the production planning process. The purpose is to assign limited resources to the most serious risk items and ensure that the product can achieve its designed functions under specific operating conditions. Most current failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) methods use the risk priority number (RPN) value to evaluate the risk of failure. However, conventional RPN methodology has not considered the situation parameter and the relationship between components of a system with respect to its type (direct/indirect) and severity. Therefore, a more general and efficient algorithm to evaluate the risk of failure is needed. This paper proposes a more general RPN methodology, which combines the ordered weighted geometric averaging (OWGA) operator and the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach for prioritization of failures in a product FMEA. A case of a thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) product that has been drawn from a professional liquid crystal display manufacturer is presented to further illustrate the proposed approach. The result of the proposed method is compared with the listing approaches of risk assessment methods. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1586 / 1596
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, POT FAIL MOD EFF AN
[2]   An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis [J].
Bowles, JB .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :380-386
[3]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[4]  
Braglia M., 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P503, DOI 10.1108/02656710310468687
[5]  
Braglia M., 2000, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V17, P1017, DOI [10.1108/02656710010353885, DOI 10.1108/02656710010353885]
[6]   Failure analysis-assisted FMEA [J].
Cassanelli, G. ;
Mura, G. ;
Fantini, F. ;
Vanzi, M. ;
Plano, B. .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2006, 46 (9-11) :1795-1799
[7]   The reliability of general vague fault-tree analysis on weapon systems fault diagnosis [J].
Chang, JR ;
Chang, KH ;
Liao, SH ;
Cheng, CH .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2006, 10 (07) :531-542
[8]   Reliability assessment of an aircraft propulsion system using IFS and OWA tree [J].
Chang, K. -H. ;
Cheng, C. -H. ;
Chang, Y. -C. .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 40 (10) :907-921
[9]  
CHANG KH, SOFT COMPUT IN PRESS
[10]   MCDM aggregation model using situational ME-OWA and ME-OWGA operators [J].
Cheng, Ching-Hsue ;
Chang, Jing-Rong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (04) :421-443