Influence of traffic on the PM10 and PM2.5 urban aerosol fractions in Madrid (Spain)

被引:74
作者
Artíñano, B
Salvador, P
Alonso, DG
Querol, X
Alastuey, A
机构
[1] CIEMAT, Environm Dept, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] CSIC, Inst Earth Sci Jaume Almera, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
urban aerosols; particle composition; PM10; PM2.5; PM1; road transport; particle monitoring; Madrid; urban pollution;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.032
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A preliminary assessment carried out in Madrid demonstrates the difficulty of compliance with the new European PM10 tolerances. Daily and annual limiting values would be exceeded at almost all the network stations under the terms of the directive's second stage. An experimental study, based on the chemical characterisation of the PM10 and PM2.5 fractions sampled at a representative urban site, provides the major mass contents of these two fractions. These are mainly related to two different particle sources: combustion processes including traffic emissions and mineral-origin particles. Nonmineral carbon is the major component of particulate matter in this region, mostly in the PM2.5 fraction, increasing its contribution in wintertime. The second largest component identified in the PM10 mass, is associated with crustal origin particles and is more relevant in summer, whereas the second largest contributor to PM2.5 is secondary particles. In general, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations show good agreement with traffic-related pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and CO, being time-correlated in winter pollution episodes. PM1 and PM2.5 have been simultaneous and continuously measured indicating road transport as the main source of these finer fractions. Mineral contribution has been mainly identified in the coarser particles associated with dust resuspension and some long-range transport events of Saharan dust, although they are also present in the finer PM2.5 fraction. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 123
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Airbone Particles Expert Group (APEG), 1999, SOURC APP PART MATT
[2]   Evaluation of the TEOM(R) method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas [J].
Allen, G ;
Sioutas, C ;
Koutrakis, P ;
Reiss, R ;
Lurmann, FW ;
Roberts, PT .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1997, 47 (06) :682-689
[3]  
Artíñano B, 2001, ATMOS ENVIRON, V35, pS43
[4]  
ARTINANO B, 1994, TRANSPORT TRANSFORMA, P294
[5]  
BERDOWSKI JJM, 1996, 96472 TNO MEP R
[6]   Sources and chemistry of PM(10) aerosol in Santa Barbara County, CA [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Countess, RJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (09) :1489-1499
[7]  
*EEA, ENV AG EUR ENV 2 ASS
[8]  
Font I., 1983, CLIMATOLOGIA ESPANA
[9]   Comparative receptor modelling study of airborne particulate pollutants in Birmingham (United Kingdom), Coimbra (Portugal) and Lahore (Pakistan) [J].
Harrison, RM ;
Smith, DJT ;
Pio, CA ;
Castro, LM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (20) :3309-3321
[10]   Sources and processes affecting concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter in Birmingham (UK) [J].
Harrison, RM ;
Deacon, AR ;
Jones, MR ;
Appleby, RS .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (24) :4103-4117