The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era

被引:108
作者
Boorjian, Stephen A. [1 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [2 ]
Crispen, Paul L. [2 ]
Carlson, Rachel E. [3 ]
Rangel, Laureano J. [3 ]
Bergstralh, Eric J. [3 ]
Blute, Michael L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; prostate-specific antigen; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS; CANCER RECURRENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The presence of a positive surgical margin at radical prostatectomy has been linked to an increased risk of postoperative biochemical recurrence. We evaluated the impact of margin status on subsequent clinical progression and mortality. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 11,729 patients who underwent prostatectomy between 1990 and 2006. Survival was estimated for patients with vs without a positive margin and compared using the log rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the impact of margin status on survival. Results: Overall 3,651 (31.1%) men were identified with a positive margin. Median postoperative followup was 8.2 years (IQR 4.4, 12.1). The 10-year biochemical recurrence-free rate for patients with and without a positive margin was 56% and 77%, respectively (p < 0.001), while 10-year local recurrence-free survival was 89% vs 95% (p < 0.001). Margin status also stratified systemic progression-free survival (93% vs 97%, p < 0.001), cancer specific survival (96% vs 99%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (83% vs 88%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis the presence of a positive margin was associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.47-1.80, p < 0.0001), local recurrence (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.45-2.19, p < 0.0001) and receipt of salvage therapy (HR 1.79,95% CI 1.58-2.02, p < 0.0001) but was not a significant predictor of systemic progression (p = 0.95), cancer specific death (p = 0.15) or overall mortality (p = 0.16). Conclusions: The presence of a positive margin increased the risk of biochemical recurrence, local recurrence and the need for salvage treatment but was not independently associated with systemic progression, cancer specific death or overall mortality. These results should be considered when evaluating patients for adjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1009
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Gleason, DF ;
Barry, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :975-980
[2]   Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, JM ;
Martin, SK ;
Amling, CL ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :733-739
[3]   Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Iocca, A ;
Scherer, B ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) :119-125
[4]   Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy:: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911) [J].
Bolla, M ;
van Poppel, H ;
Collette, L ;
van Cangh, P ;
Vekemans, K ;
Da Pozzo, L ;
de Reijke, TM ;
Verbaeys, A ;
Bosset, JF ;
van Velthoven, R ;
Maréchal, JM ;
Scalliet, P ;
Haustermans, K ;
Piérart, M .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9485) :572-578
[5]   STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BOSTWICK, DG ;
MYERS, RP ;
OESTERLING, JE .
SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 10 (01) :60-72
[6]   Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy [J].
Chang, Sam S. ;
Cookson, Michael S. .
UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (02) :249-252
[7]   Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: Implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE) [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :S21-S25
[8]   Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Riedel, E ;
Begg, CB ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Gerigk, C ;
Gonen, M ;
Reuter, V ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2292-2295
[9]   Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Eastham, James A. ;
Kurolwa, Kentaro ;
Ohorl, Makoto ;
Serlo, Angel M. ;
Gorbonos, Alex ;
Maru, Norio ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Slawin, Kevin M. ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (05) :965-969
[10]   Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) :651-&