A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records

被引:162
作者
Dietz, Patricia M.
England, Lucinda J.
Callaghan, William M.
Pearl, Michelle
Wier, Megan L.
Kharrazi, Martin
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Genet Dis Screening Program, Richmond, CA USA
[3] Sequoia Fdn, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
gestation; ultrasound estimate; LMP estimate; perterm rate; post-term rate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although early ultrasound (< 20 weeks' gestation) systematically underestimates the gestational age of smaller fetuses by approximately 1-2 days, this bias is relatively small compared with the large error introduced by last menstrual period (LMP) estimates of gestation, as evidenced by the number of implausible birthweight-for-gestational age. To characterise this misclassification, we compared gestational age estimates based on LMP from California birth certificates with those based on early ultrasound from a California linked Statewide Expanded Alpha-fetoprotein Screening Program (XAFP). The final sample comprised 165 908 women. Birthweight distributions were plotted by gestational age; sensitivity and positive predictive value for preterm rates according to LMP were calculated using ultrasound as the 'gold standard'. For gestational ages 20-27 and 28-31 weeks, the LMP-based birthweight distributions were bimodal, whereas the ultrasound-based distributions were unimodal, but had long right tails. At 32-36 weeks, the LMP distribution was wider, flatter, and shifted to the right, compared with the ultrasound distribution. LMP vs. ultrasound estimates were, respectively, 8.7% vs. 7.9% preterm (< 37 weeks), 81.2% vs. 91.0% term (37-41 weeks), and 10.1% vs. 1.1% post-term (>= 42 weeks). The sensitivity of the LMP-based preterm birth estimate was 64.3%, and the positive predictive value was 58.7%. Overall, 17.2% of the records had estimates with an absolute difference of > 14 days. The groups most likely to have inconsistent gestational age estimates included African American and Hispanic women, younger and less-educated women, and those who entered prenatal care after the second month of pregnancy. In conclusion, we found substantial misclassification of LMP-based gestational age. The 2003 revised US Standard Certificate of Live Birth includes a new gestational age item, the obstetric estimate. It will be important to assess whether this estimate addresses the problems presented by LMP-based gestational age.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 71
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2004, Obstet Gynecol, V104, P1449
[2]   MENSTRUAL-CYCLE LENGTH AND THE CALCULATION OF GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
BERG, AT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 133 (06) :585-589
[3]   How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? [J].
Chervenak, FA ;
Skupski, DW ;
Romero, R ;
Myers, MK ;
Smith-Levitin, M ;
Rosenwaks, Z ;
Thaler, HT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (04) :678-687
[4]   THE QUALITY AND COMPLETENESS OF BIRTH-WEIGHT AND GESTATIONAL-AGE DATA IN COMPUTERIZED BIRTH FILES [J].
DAVID, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1980, 70 (09) :964-973
[5]   BIAS IN STUDIES OF PRETERM AND POSTTERM DELIVERY DUE TO ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
HENRIKSEN, TB ;
WILCOX, AJ ;
HEDEGAARD, M ;
SECHER, NJ .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (05) :533-537
[6]   Fetal age assessment based on ultrasound head biometry and the effect of maternal and fetal factors [J].
Johnsen, SL ;
Rasmussen, S ;
Sollien, R ;
Kiserud, T .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (08) :716-723
[7]   Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age:: advantages and systematic errors [J].
Källén, K .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :558-563
[8]   A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age [J].
Kramer, MS ;
Platt, RW ;
Wen, SW ;
Joseph, KS ;
Allen, A ;
Abrahamowicz, M ;
Blondel, B ;
Bréart, G .
PEDIATRICS, 2001, 108 (02) :E35
[9]   Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation? [J].
Larsen, T ;
Nguyen, TH ;
Greisen, G ;
Engholm, G ;
Moller, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (02) :238-244
[10]   Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates [J].
Morin, I ;
Morin, L ;
Zhang, X ;
Platt, RW ;
Blondel, B ;
Bréart, G ;
Usher, R ;
Kramer, MS .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (02) :145-152