Simulation of maize yield under water stress with the EPICphase and CROPWAT models

被引:88
作者
Cavero, J
Farre, I
Debaeke, P
Faci, JM
机构
[1] CSIC, Estac Expt Aula Dei, Dep Genet & Prod Vegetal, E-50080 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] DGA, Serv Invest Agroalimentaria, Unidad Suelos & Riegos, Zaragoza 50080, Spain
[3] INRA, Stn Agron, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2000.924679x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Models that simulate the effects of water stress on crop yield ran be valuable tools in irrigation, We evaluated the crop growth simulation model EPICphase and the model CROPWAT on their ability to simulate maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield reduction caused by water stress under semiarid conditions. The simulation of evapotranspiration (ET), harvest index (HI), Leaf area index (LAI), and final biomass was also evaluated. Data from three held experiments were used to test the models. In one sprinkler-irrigated experiment, different water amounts (0-592 mm) were applied, producing a continuous water deficit. The other two experiments were flood-irrigated and water stress was imposed at given development stages of maize. EPICphase simulated the ET with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 40 mm. The regression of the EPICphase simulated vs. measured values of tit and yield had intercepts that were not significantly different from ii and slopes not different from 1. EPICphase overestimated the biomass in the more water-stressed treatments (intercept of simulated vs. measured values = 5.25 t ha(-1)) due to overestimation of LAI, Modifications of EPICphase relative to the effect of water stress on LAI growth and on the light extinction coefficient improved the simulations of LAI, biomass, HI, and yield. CROPWAT calculated maize grain yield with a RMSE of 14% but overestimated ET in the flood-irrigated treatments (bias = 58 mm and 31 mm). Better simulation of ET by EPICphase makes this model more consistent for calculating yield reduction due to water stress.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 690
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   IMMEDIATE AND SUBSEQUENT GROWTH RESPONSES OF MAIZE LEAVES TO CHANGES IN WATER STATUS [J].
ACEVEDO, E ;
HSIAO, TC ;
HENDERSON, DW .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1971, 48 (05) :631-+
[2]  
AHUJA LR, 1990, AGRON MONOGR, V30, P143
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HYDR HDB
[4]  
[Anonymous], AGROCLIMATOLOGIA REG
[5]  
ANSELIN L., 1988, SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS
[6]   DIFFUSIVE RESISTANCE, TRANSPIRATION, AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN SINGLE LEAVES OF CORN AND SORGHUM IN RELATION TO LEAF WATER POTENTIAL [J].
BEADLE, CL ;
STEVENSON, KR ;
NEUMANN, HH ;
THURTELL, GW ;
KING, KM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1973, 53 (03) :537-544
[7]   TESTING EFFECTIVENESS OF 4 SIMULATION-MODELS FOR ESTIMATING NITRATES AND WATER IN 2 SOILS [J].
BECKIE, HJ ;
MOULIN, AP ;
CAMPBELL, CA ;
BRANDT, SA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1995, 75 (01) :135-143
[8]   Quantitative analysis of the combined effects of temperature, evaporative demand and light on leaf elongation rate in well-watered field and laboratory-grown maize plants [J].
Salah, HBH ;
Tardieu, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1996, 47 (304) :1689-1698
[9]   INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF NITROGEN AND WATER STRESSES ON BIOMASS ACCUMULATION, NITROGEN UPTAKE, AND SEED YIELD OF MAIZE [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
MUTTI, LSM ;
RAO, PSC ;
JONES, JW .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1989, 19 (04) :297-311
[10]   Dry matter accumulation and distribution in five cultivars of maize (Zea mays):: relationships and procedures for use in crop modelling [J].
Birch, CJ ;
Hammer, GL ;
Rickert, KG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1999, 50 (04) :513-527