Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database

被引:1290
作者
Hawkins, Paul C. D. [1 ]
Skillman, A. Geoffrey [1 ]
Warren, Gregory L. [1 ]
Ellingson, Benjamin A. [1 ]
Stahl, Matthew T. [1 ]
机构
[1] OpenEye Sci Software, Santa Fe, NM 87508 USA
关键词
CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; MOLECULES; ACCURACY; CATALYST; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1021/ci100031x
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Here, we present the algorithm and validation for OMEGA, a systematic, knowledge-based conformer generator. The algorithm consists of three phases: assembly of an initial 3D structure from a library of fragments; exhaustive enumeration of all rotatable torsions using values drawn from a knowledge-based list of angles, thereby generating a large set of conformations; and sampling of this set by geometric and energy criteria. Validation of conformer generators like OMEGA has often been undertaken by comparing computed conformer sets to experimental molecular conformations from crystallography, usually from the Protein Databank (PDB). Such an approach is fraught with difficulty due to the systematic problems with small molecule structures in the PDB. Methods are presented to identify a diverse set of small molecule structures from cocomplexes in the PDB that has maximal reliability. A challenging set of 197 high quality, carefully selected ligand structures from well-solved models was obtained using these methods. This set will provide a sound basis for comparison and validation of conformer generators in the future. Validation results from this set are compared to the results using structures of a set of druglike molecules extracted from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). OMEGA is found to perform very well in reproducing the crystallographic conformations from both these data sets using two complementary metrics of success.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 584
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Contact area difference (CAD): A robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models [J].
Abagyan, RA ;
Totrov, MM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 268 (03) :678-685
[2]   Conformational sampling of bioactive molecules: A comparative study [J].
Agrafiotis, Dimitris K. ;
Gibbs, Alan C. ;
Zhu, Fangqiang ;
Izrailev, Sergei ;
Martin, Eric .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (03) :1067-1086
[3]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[4]   Rearrangement of Cruickshank's formulae for the diffraction-component precision index [J].
Blow, DM .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 58 :792-797
[5]   Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations [J].
Boström, J ;
Greenwood, JR ;
Gottfries, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2003, 21 (05) :449-462
[6]  
BOSTROM J, 2007, EXPLOITING LIGAND CO
[7]   Small molecule conformational preferences derived from crystal structure data. A medicinal chemistry focused analysis [J].
Brameld, Ken A. ;
Kuhn, Bernd ;
Reuter, Deborah C. ;
Stahl, Martin .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2008, 48 (01) :1-24
[8]   FREE R-VALUE - A NOVEL STATISTICAL QUANTITY FOR ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES [J].
BRUNGER, AT .
NATURE, 1992, 355 (6359) :472-475
[9]   Conformational sampling of druglike molecules with MOE and catalyst: Implications for pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening [J].
Chen, I-Jen ;
Foloppe, Nicolas .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2008, 48 (09) :1773-1791
[10]   Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult [J].
Cole, JC ;
Murray, CW ;
Nissink, JWM ;
Taylor, RD ;
Taylor, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (03) :325-332