Group specific optimisation of fMRI processing steps for child and adult data

被引:26
作者
Evans, J. W. [1 ,3 ]
Todd, R. M. [2 ]
Taylor, M. J. [1 ,3 ]
Strother, S. C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Ontario Inst Studies Educ, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Res Inst & Diagnost Imaging, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[4] Baycrest, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
fMRI; Child; Adult; Preprocessing; Motion parameter regression; Motion correction; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING EXPERIMENTS; MOTION CORRECTION; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; HEAD MOTION; ALGORITHMS; SUBJECT; SOFTWARE; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.039
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Motion is a major issue in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataseries and causes artifacts or increased overall noise obscuring signals of interest. It is particularly important to be able to control for and correct these artifacts when dealing with child data. We analysed the data from 35 children (4-8 years old) and 13 adults (18-30 years old) during an emotional face paradigm. The children were split into low and high motion groups on the basis of having less or more than an estimated maximal movement of one voxel (3.75 mm) and one degree of rotation in any motion direction between any pair of scans in the run. Several different preprocessing steps were evaluated for their ability to correct for the excess motion using agnostic canonical variates analysis (aCVA) in the NPAIRS (Nonparametric, Prediction, Activation, Influence, Reproducibility, re-Sampling) framework. The adult dataset was reasonably stable whereas the motion-prone child datasets benefited greatly from motion parameter regression (MPR). Motion parameter regression had a strong beneficial impact on all datasets, a result that was largely unaffected by other preprocessing choices; however, motion correction on its own did not have as much impact. The low motion child group subjected to MPR had reproducibility values at par with those of the adult group, but needed almost twice as many subjects to achieve this result, indicating weaker responses in young children. The aCVA showed greater sensitivity to the task response pattern than the mixed effects general linear model (mGLM) in the expected face processing regions, although the mGLM showed more responses in some other areas. This work illustrates that preprocessing choices must be made in a group-specific fashion to optimise fMRI results. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 490
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series [J].
Andersson, JLR ;
Hutton, C ;
Ashburner, J ;
Turner, R ;
Friston, K .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (05) :903-919
[2]   A quantitative comparison of motion detection algorithms in fMRI [J].
Ardekani, BA ;
Bachman, AH ;
Helpern, JA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 19 (07) :959-963
[3]   Practical aspects of conducting large-scale functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in children [J].
Byars, AW ;
Holland, SK ;
Strawsburg, RH ;
Bommer, W ;
Dunn, RS ;
Schmithorst, VJ ;
Plante, E .
JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2002, 17 (12) :885-890
[4]   AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages [J].
Cox, RW .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (03) :162-173
[5]   Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information [J].
Freire, A ;
Lee, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (04) :347-371
[6]   Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion [J].
Freire, L ;
Mangin, JF .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (03) :709-722
[7]   The trouble with cognitive subtraction [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Price, CJ ;
Fletcher, P ;
Moore, C ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Dolan, RJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (02) :97-104
[8]   Neural response to the visual familiarity of faces [J].
Gobbini, M. Ida ;
Haxby, James V. .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2006, 71 (1-3) :76-82
[9]   Characterization and correction of interpolation effects in the realignment of fMRI time series [J].
Grootoonk, S ;
Hutton, C ;
Ashburner, J ;
Howseman, AM ;
Josephs, O ;
Rees, G ;
Friston, KJ ;
Turner, R .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (01) :49-57
[10]   ARTIFACTS DUE TO STIMULUS CORRELATED MOTION IN FUNCTIONAL IMAGING OF THE BRAIN [J].
HAJNAL, JV ;
MYERS, R ;
OATRIDGE, A ;
SCHWIESO, JE ;
YOUNG, IR ;
BYDDER, GM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1994, 31 (03) :283-291