MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants

被引:77
作者
Polo, A
Cattani, F
Vavassori, A
Origgi, D
Villa, G
Marsiglia, H
Bellomi, M
Tosi, G
De Cobelli, O
Orecchia, R
机构
[1] Inst Catalan Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Barcelona 08097, Spain
[2] European Inst Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Div Radiol, Milan, Italy
[4] European Inst Oncol, Div Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] European Inst Oncol, Dept Med Phys, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Inst Radiol, Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Milan, Fac Med, Milan, Italy
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 05期
关键词
CT-MRI image fusion; implant evaluation; permanent implant; prostate; brachytherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.033
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the outcome of two different image-based postimplant dosimetry methods in permanent seed implantation. Methods and Materials: Between October 1999 and October 2002, 150 patients with low-risk prostate carcinoma were treated with I-125 and Pd-103 in our institution. A CT-MRI image fusion protocol was used in 21 consecutive patients treated with exclusive brachytherapy. The accuracy and reproducibility of the method was calculated, and then the CT-based dosimetry was compared with the CT-MRI-based dosimetry using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) related parameters recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Results: Our method for CT-MRI image fusion was accurate and reproducible (median shift <1 mm). Differences in prostate volume were found, depending on the image modality used. Quality assurance DVH-related parameters strongly depended on the image modality (CT vs. CT-MRI): V-100 = 82% vs. 88%, p < 0.05. D-90 = 96% vs. 115%, p < 0.05. Those results depend on the institutional implant technique and reflect the importance of lowering inter- and intraobserver discrepancies when outlining prostate and organs at risk for postimplant dosimetry. Conclusions: Computed tomography-MRI fused images allow accurate determination of prostate size, significantly improving the dosimetric evaluation based on DVH analysis. This provides a consistent method to judge a prostate seed implant's quality. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1579
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry [J].
Al-Qaisieh, B ;
Ash, D ;
Bottomley, DM ;
Carey, BM .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :267-273
[2]   TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND VERSUS MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE ESTIMATION OF PROSTATIC VOLUME [J].
ALRIMAWI, M ;
GRIFFITHS, DJ ;
BOAKE, RC ;
MADOR, DR ;
JOHNSON, MA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 74 (05) :596-600
[3]   Prostate seed implant quality assessment using MR and CT image fusion [J].
Amdur, RJ ;
Gladstone, D ;
Leopold, KA ;
Harris, RD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (01) :67-72
[4]   Comparability of CT-based and TRUS-based prostate volumes [J].
Badiozamani, KR ;
Wallner, K ;
Cavanagh, W ;
Blasko, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (02) :375-378
[5]   Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy [J].
Bice, WS ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Grimm, PD ;
Friedland, JL ;
Feygelman, V ;
Roach, M ;
Prete, JL ;
Dubois, DF ;
Blasko, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04) :921-927
[6]   Brachytherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: Techniques, patient selection, and clinical outcomes [J].
Blasko, JC ;
Mate, T ;
Sylvester, JE ;
Grimm, PD ;
Cavanagh, W .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) :81-94
[7]   Interphysician variability in defining the planning target volume in the irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles [J].
Cazzaniga, LF ;
Marinoni, MA ;
Bossi, A ;
Bianchi, E ;
Cagna, E ;
Cosentino, D ;
Scandolaro, L ;
Valli, M ;
Frigerio, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :293-296
[8]   Source localization following permanent transperineal prostate interstitial brachytherapy using magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Dubois, DF ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Hotchkiss, LA ;
Bice, WS ;
Prete, JJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (05) :1037-1041
[9]   Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy [J].
Dubois, DF ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Hotchkiss, LA ;
Prete, JJ ;
Bice, WS .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :785-789
[10]   Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning [J].
Fiorino, C ;
Reni, M ;
Bolognesi, A ;
Cattaneo, GM ;
Calandrino, R .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :285-292