Treatment and prevention of obesity: What works, what doesn't work, and what might work

被引:8
作者
Allison, DB
Weber, MT
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Clin Nutr Res Ctr, Sect Stat Genet, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Biostat, Sect Stat Genet, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Sch Nursing, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11745-003-1045-5
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We provide a very broad conceptual overview of some of the issues involved in the treatment and prevention of obesity. Data suggest that clinicians have some ability to promote positive changes with obesity treatment. The environment, though important in influencing one's degree of adiposity, has largely transient effects that do not tend to carry over from one time to substantially later times. In contrast, the genetic influences on body mass index at any one time do tend to carry over to later times. This information influences the types of approaches that are and are not likely to be successful in terms of preventing obesity or reducing obesity on a population level. A second issue concerns the composition of weight lost. Conditional on fat loss, weight loss has been associated with an increased mortality rate (MR) whereas, conditional upon weight loss, fat loss has been associated with a decreased MR. This suggests that we should seek treatments that maximize the proportion of weight lost as fat. Third, the efficacy of current treatments is far below patients' expectations and desires. We need both to increase the efficacy of our treatments dramatically and help patients adjust their expectations so that they can take satisfaction in smaller weight losses. Perhaps, with continued efforts at enhancing treatments, we will see incremental advances in the treatment and prevention of obesity.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 155
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   OBESITY IN PET DOGS [J].
MASON, E .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1970, 86 (21) :612-&
[42]   Long-term effects of a physical education curriculum and staff development program: SPARK [J].
McKenzie, TL ;
Sallis, JF ;
Kolody, B ;
Faucette, FN .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1997, 68 (04) :280-291
[43]   PREFERRED VERSUS NONPREFERRED TREATMENT, AND SELF-CONTROL TRAINING VERSUS DETERMINATION RAISING AS TREATMENTS OF OBESITY - PILOT-STUDY [J].
MURRAY, DC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1976, 38 (01) :191-198
[44]  
Pronk N P, 1994, Obes Res, V2, P587
[45]   Television viewing and childhood obesity [J].
Robinson, TN .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 48 (04) :1017-+
[46]   Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Robinson, TN .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (16) :1561-1567
[47]   Randomised controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity [J].
Sahota, P ;
Rudolf, MCJ ;
Dixey, R ;
Hill, AJ ;
Barth, JH ;
Cade, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7320) :1029-1032
[48]   Twins and virtual twins: bases of relative body weight revisited [J].
Segal, NL ;
Allison, DB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2002, 26 (04) :437-441
[49]   SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND OBESITY - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
SOBAL, J ;
STUNKARD, AJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (02) :260-275
[50]  
SORENSON TIA, 2003, INT ASS STUDY OBES O, V4, P3