Organization and representation of patient safety data: Current status and issues around generalizability and scalability

被引:23
作者
Boxwala, AA
Dieks, M
Keenan, M
Jackson, S
Hanscom, R
Bates, DW
Sato, L
机构
[1] Eclipsys Corp, Boston, MA 02135 USA
[2] Harvard Med Inst Inc, Risk Management Fdn, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Healthcare Qual, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] MIT, Comp Sci Lab, Clin Decis Making Grp, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med,Partners Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Decis Syst Grp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1197/jamia.M1317
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recent reports have identified medical errors as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients. A variety of approaches have been implemented to identify errors and their causes. These approaches include retrospective reporting and investigation of errors and adverse events and prospective analyses for identifying hazardous situations. The above approaches, along with other sources, contribute to data that are used to analyze patient safety risks. A variety of data structures and terminologies have been created to represent the information contained in these sources of patient safety data. Whereas many representations may be well suited to the particular safety application for which they were developed, such application-specific and often organization-specific representations limit the sharability of patient safety data. The result is that aggregation and comparison of safety data across organizations, practice domains, and applications is difficult at best. A common reference data model and a broadly applicable terminology for patient safety data are needed to aggregate safety data at the regional and national level and conduct large-scale studies of patient safety risks and interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 478
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[21]   Adverse drug reactions in patients admitted to hospital identified by discharge ICD-10 codes and by spontaneous reports [J].
Cox, AR ;
Anton, C ;
Goh, CHF ;
Easter, M ;
Langford, NJ ;
Ferner, RE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 52 (03) :337-339
[22]  
*CTR MED MED SERV, 2002, INT CLASS DIS
[23]   THE INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM DOES NOT DETECT ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS - A PROBLEM FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT [J].
CULLEN, DJ ;
BATES, DW ;
SMALL, SD ;
COOPER, JB ;
NEMESKAL, AR ;
LEAPE, LL .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1995, 21 (10) :541-548
[24]  
Davies JB, 2000, Cognition, Technology & Work, V2, P117, DOI DOI 10.1007/PL00011494
[25]  
DeRosier Joseph, 2002, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V28, P248
[26]   Airway injury during anesthesia - A closed claims analysis [J].
Domino, KB ;
Posner, KL ;
Caplan, RA ;
Cheney, FW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (06) :1703-1711
[27]   A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice [J].
Dovey, SM ;
Meyers, DS ;
Phillips, RL ;
Green, LA ;
Fryer, GE ;
Galliher, JM ;
Kappus, J ;
Grob, P .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (03) :233-238
[28]  
EVANS RS, 1992, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V20, P4
[29]   Proportion of hospital deaths associated with adverse events [J].
García-Martín, M ;
Lardelli-Claret, P ;
Bueno-Cavanillas, A ;
Luna-del-Castillo, JD ;
Espigares-García, M ;
Gálvez-Vargas, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (12) :1319-1326
[30]   Risk analysis of Leksell Gamma Knife Model C with Automatic Positioning System [J].
Goetsch, SJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (03) :869-877