Chromosome rearrangements between chicken and guinea fowl defined by comparative chromosome painting and FISH mapping of DNA clones

被引:31
作者
Shibusawa, M
Nishida-Umehara, C
Masabanda, J
Griffin, DK
Isobe, T
Matsuda, Y
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Ctr Adv Sci & Technol, Lab Anim Cytogenet, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600810, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Environm Earth Sci, Div Biosci, Lab Cytogenet, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600810, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Sci, Chromosome Res Unit, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600810, Japan
[4] Brunel Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000069813
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Chromosome homology between chicken (Gallus gallus) and guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) was investigated by comparative chromosome painting with chicken whole chromosome paints for chromosomes 1-9 and Z and by comparative mapping of 38 macrochromosome-specific (chromosomes 1-8 and Z) and 30 microchromosome-specific chicken cosmid DNA clones. The comparative chromosome analysis revealed that the homology of macrochromosomes is highly conserved between the two species except for two inter-chromosomal rearrangements. Guinea fowl chromosome 4 represented the centric fusion of chicken chromosome 9 with the q arm of chicken chromosome 4. Guinea fowl chromosome 5 resulted from the fusion of chicken chromosomes 6 and 7. A pericentric inversion was found in guinea fowl chromosome 7, which corresponded to chicken chromosome 8. All the chicken microchromosome-specific DNA clones were also localized to microchromosomes of guinea fowl except for several clones localized to the short arm of chromosome 4. These results suggest that the cytogenetic genome organization is highly conserved between chicken and guinea fowl. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 230
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A KARYOLOGICAL STUDY OF 55 SPECIES OF BIRDS, INCLUDING KARYOTYPES OF 39 SPECIES NEW TO CYTOLOGY [J].
BELTERMAN, RHR ;
DEBOER, LEM .
GENETICA, 1984, 65 :39-82
[2]   REVERSE CHROMOSOME PAINTING - A METHOD FOR THE RAPID ANALYSIS OF ABERRANT CHROMOSOMES IN CLINICAL CYTOGENETICS [J].
CARTER, NP ;
FERGUSONSMITH, MA ;
PERRYMAN, MT ;
TELENIUS, H ;
PELMEAR, AH ;
LEVERSHA, MA ;
GLANCY, MT ;
WOOD, SL ;
COOK, K ;
DYSON, HM ;
FERGUSONSMITH, ME ;
WILLATT, LR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1992, 29 (05) :299-307
[3]   Micro- and macrochromosome paints generated by flow cytometry and microdissection: tools for mapping the chicken genome [J].
Griffin, DK ;
Haberman, F ;
Masabanda, J ;
O'Brien, P ;
Bagga, M ;
Sazanov, A ;
Smith, J ;
Burt, DW ;
Ferguson-Smith, M ;
Wienberg, J .
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1999, 87 (3-4) :278-281
[4]  
Groenen MAM, 2000, GENOME RES, V10, P137
[5]   Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells [J].
Habermann, FA ;
Cremer, M ;
Walter, J ;
Kreth, G ;
von Hase, J ;
Bauer, K ;
Wienberg, J ;
Cremer, C ;
Cremer, T ;
Solovei, I .
CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2001, 9 (07) :569-584
[6]   PHYSICAL ORDERING OF 3 POLYMORPHIC DNA MARKERS SPANNING THE REGIONS CONTAINING A TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE OF RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA BY 3-COLOR FLUORESCENT INSITU HYBRIDIZATION [J].
INAZAWA, J ;
ARIYAMA, T ;
ABE, T .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1992, 83 (12) :1248-1252
[7]   Chicken microsatellite primers are not efficient markers for Japanese quail [J].
Inoue-Murayama, M ;
Kayang, BB ;
Kimura, K ;
Ide, H ;
Nomura, A ;
Takahashi, H ;
Nagamine, Y ;
Takeda, T ;
Hanada, H ;
Tatsuda, K ;
Tsudzuki, M ;
Matsuda, Y ;
Mizutani, M ;
Murayama, Y ;
Ito, S .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 2001, 32 (01) :7-11
[8]   A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic [J].
Kimball, RT ;
Braun, EL ;
Zwartjes, PW ;
Crowe, TM ;
Ligon, JD .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 11 (01) :38-54
[9]  
KORNEGAY JR, 1993, J MOL EVOL, V37, P367, DOI 10.1007/BF00178867
[10]   APPLICATION OF FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION IN GENOME ANALYSIS OF THE MOUSE [J].
MATSUDA, Y ;
CHAPMAN, VM .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 1995, 16 (02) :261-272