Modelling optimal strategies for decreasing nitrate loss with variation in weather - a farm-level approach

被引:31
作者
Gibbons, JM [1 ]
Sparkes, DL [1 ]
Wilson, P [1 ]
Ramsden, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biosci, Div Agr & Environm Sci, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
关键词
nitrate loss; farm-level models; decision making; management strategies; sandy soils;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2004.02.010
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A farm-level framework for assessing the economic impact of measures to reduce nitrate loss by leaching is described. The framework links a database of crop treatments and nitrogen loss generated with the IACR SUNDIAL model for 10 years of weather and an economic model, Farm-adapt, for a root-cropping farm on sandy loam in the East Midlands of England. Weather induced variation in nitrate loss over time was greater than that resulting from differences in management practice. Limits on nitrate loss per hectare resulted in a relatively small annual mean cost to the farm when allowed to choose the optimal management practice (including doing nothing) in each year (e.g. pound8 ha(-1) for a 30 kg ha(-1) limit, resulting in a 6.2 kg ha(-1) and 3.2 mg l(-1) reduction in mean nitrate-N loss and mean nitrate-N concentration, respectively). In no years was it feasible with the treatments tested to reduce concentration of nitrate-N to the EU limit of 11.3 mg l(-1) in every week of the year. A mean annual loss of 11.3 mg l(-1) was feasible in four out of 10 years at a mean cost of pound10 ha(-1). The most cost-effective reductions of loss (in terms of pound kg(-1) nitrate-N ha(-1)) were achieved by targeted reductions in N application followed by a combination of reduced N and growing winter cover before spring crops. Untargeted limits (quotas) on nitrogen, nitrogen taxes and application of single management practices were less cost effective than combinations of practices. Three management strategies, based on these combinations, were imposed for all years. Mean costs were greater than where the farm could choose the optimal management practice in each year; a 4.67mg l(-1) reduction in nitrate-N concentration cost pound19 ha(-1) and a 5.88 mg l(-1) reduction pound33 ha(-1). (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 134
页数:22
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Ramsden S. J., 2000, Farm Management, V10, P606
[22]  
Shepherd MA, 1999, SOIL USE MANAGE, V15, P41, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00062.x
[23]   Nitrate leaching from a sandy soil: The effect of previous crop and post-harvest soil management in an arable rotation [J].
Shepherd, MA ;
Lord, EI .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 127 :215-229
[24]   SUNDIAL: A PC-based system for simulating nitrogen dynamics in arable land [J].
Smith, JU ;
Bradbury, NJ ;
Addiscott, TM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1996, 88 (01) :38-43
[25]   Farming options for The Netherlands explored by multi-objective modelling [J].
ten Berge, HFM ;
van Ittersum, MK ;
Rossing, WAH ;
van de Ven, GWJ ;
Schans, J ;
van de Sanden, PACM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2000, 13 (2-3) :263-277
[26]   ECECMOD: an interdisciplinary modelling system for analyzing nutrient and soil losses from agriculture [J].
Vatn, A ;
Bakken, L ;
Botterweg, P ;
Romstad, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 30 (02) :189-205
[27]   The effects of site and season on the fate of nitrogen residues from root crops grown on sandy soils [J].
Webb, J ;
SylvesterBradley, R ;
Seeney, FM .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1997, 128 :445-460
[28]   Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development [J].
Zander, P ;
Kächele, H .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1999, 59 (03) :311-325
[29]  
1994, FERTILISER RECOMMEND
[30]  
1995, BRIT SURVEY FERTILIS