Regulation of anaerobic dehalorespiration by the transcriptional activator CprK

被引:37
作者
Pop, SM [1 ]
Kolarik, RJ [1 ]
Ragsdale, SW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Beadle Ctr, Dept Biochem, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M409435200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Desulfomonile, Desulfitobacterium, and Dehalobacter are anaerobic microbes that can derive energy from the reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated organic compounds, many of which are environmental pollutants. There is very little information about how anaerobic dehalorespiration is regulated. An open reading frame within the Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans chlorophenol reductase (cpr) gene cluster (cprK) was proposed to be a transcriptional regulatory protein (Smidt, H., van Leest, M., van der Oost, J., and deVos, W. M. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 5683-5691). We have cloned, actively overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and purified to homogeneity the D. dehalogenans CprK. The results of electrophoretic mobility shift assays, DNA footprinting studies, and promoter-lac fusion experiments indicate that CprK is a transcriptional activator of the cpr gene cluster. CprK binds 3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenylacetate (CHPA) with high affinity (K-d=3.5 muM, determined by isothermal titration calorimetry), which promotes its specific interaction with a DNA sequence (TTAAT-N4-ACTAA) located upstream of the -35 and -10 promoter regions of several cpr genes and activates transcription of these genes. Binding to the upstream "box" sequence increases the affinity of CprK for CHPA by similar to10-fold (K-d=0.4 muM, determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assays). Chlorophenylacetate, which lacks the ortho-hydroxy group, and hydroxyphenylacetate, lacking the chlorine group, do not activate transcription or promote DNA binding, even at millimolar concentrations, at least 1000-fold higher than the K-d value for CHPA. Lacking metals, CprK is oxygen-sensitive. Oxidation by diamide, which converts thiols to the disulfide, inactivates CprK, and reduction of the oxidized protein by dithiothreitol fully restores DNA binding, indicating that CprK is redox-regulated and is active only when reduced. This is the first reported characterization of a transcriptional regulator of anaerobic dehalorespiration.
引用
收藏
页码:49910 / 49918
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Microbial dehalogenases: enzymes recruited to convert xenobiotic substrates [J].
Copley, SD .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 2 (05) :613-617
[2]   Diverse mechanistic approaches to difficult chemical transformations: Microbial dehalogenation of chlorinated aromatic compounds [J].
Copley, SD .
CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (03) :169-174
[3]   Anaerobic dechlorinating bacteria [J].
El Fantroussi, S ;
Naveau, H ;
Agathos, SN .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1998, 14 (02) :167-188
[4]   INACTIVATION OF YEAST ENOLASE BY 2,3-BUTANEDIONE [J].
ELLIOTT, JI ;
BREWER, JM .
ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 1978, 190 (01) :351-357
[5]   How to flip the (redox) switch [J].
Georgiou, G .
CELL, 2002, 111 (05) :607-610
[6]   PROPERTIES OF FNR PROTEINS SUBSTITUTED AT EACH OF THE 5 CYSTEINE RESIDUES [J].
GREEN, J ;
SHARROCKS, AD ;
GREEN, B ;
GEISOW, M ;
GUEST, JR .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 8 (01) :61-68
[7]   Functional versatility in the CRP-FNR superfamily of transcription factors: FNR and FLP [J].
Green, J ;
Scott, C ;
Guest, JR .
ADVANCES IN MICROBIAL PHYSIOLOGY, VOL 44, 2001, 44 :1-34
[8]   TIGHT REGULATION, MODULATION, AND HIGH-LEVEL EXPRESSION BY VECTORS CONTAINING THE ARABINOSE P-BAD PROMOTER [J].
GUZMAN, LM ;
BELIN, D ;
CARSON, MJ ;
BECKWITH, J .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1995, 177 (14) :4121-4130
[9]   Dehalobacter restrictus gen. nov. and sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium that reductively dechlorinates tetra- and trichloroethene in an anaerobic respiration [J].
Holliger, C ;
Hahn, D ;
Harmsen, H ;
Ludwig, W ;
Schumacher, W ;
Tindall, B ;
Vazquez, F ;
Weiss, N ;
Zehnder, AJB .
ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 169 (04) :313-321
[10]   Microbial dehalogenation [J].
Janssen, DB ;
Oppentocht, JE ;
Poelarends, GJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (03) :254-258