Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography)

被引:186
作者
Siewerdsen, JH [1 ]
Jaffray, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
flat-panel imager; cone-beam computed tomography; detective quantum efficiency; x-ray scatter; cascaded systems analysis; optimization; magnification;
D O I
10.1118/1.1286590
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A theoretical method is presented that allows identification of optimal x-ray imaging geometry, considering the effects of x-ray source distribution, imaging task, x-ray. scatter, and imager detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Each of these factors is incorporated into the ICRU-recommended figure of merit for image quality, the detectability index, which is maximized to determine the optimal system configuration. Cascaded systems analysis of flat-panel imagers (FPIs) is extended to incorporate the effects of x-ray scatter directly in the DQE, showing that x-ray scatter degrades DQE as an additive noise source. Optimal magnification is computed for FPI configurations appropriate to (but not limited to) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The sensitivity of the results is examined as a function of focal spot size, imaging task (e.g., ideal observer detection or discrimination tasks), x-ray scatter fraction, detector resolution, and additive noise. Nominal conditions for FPI-CBCT result in optimal magnification of similar to 1.4-1.6, depending primarily on the magnitude of the x-ray scatter fraction. The methodology is sufficiently general that examination of optimal geometry for other FPI applications (e.g., chest radiography, fluoroscopy, and mammography) is possible. The degree to which increased exposure can be used to compensate for x-ray scatter degradation is quantified. (C) 2000 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(00)00708-2].
引用
收藏
页码:1903 / 1914
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, J ICRU
  • [2] Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications
    Antonuk, LE
    Jee, KW
    El-Mohri, Y
    Maolinbay, M
    Nassif, S
    Rong, X
    Zhao, Q
    Siewerdsen, JH
    Street, RA
    Shah, KS
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (02) : 289 - 306
  • [3] Initial performance evaluation of an indirect-detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) prototype for megavoltage imaging
    Antonuk, LE
    El-Mohri, Y
    Huang, WD
    Jee, KW
    Siewerdsen, JH
    Maolinbay, M
    Scarpine, VE
    Sandler, H
    Yorkston, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02): : 437 - 454
  • [4] Barrett H. H., 1981, RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING
  • [5] Optimal phosphor thickness for portal imaging
    Bissonnette, JP
    Cunningham, IA
    Munro, P
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (06) : 803 - 814
  • [6] OPTIMAL RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION FOR PORTAL IMAGING
    BISSONNETTE, JP
    JAFFRAY, DA
    FENSTER, A
    MUNRO, P
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (09) : 1435 - 1445
  • [7] MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION OF THE SCATTERED RADIATION DISTRIBUTION IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY
    BOONE, JM
    SEIBERT, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (05) : 713 - 720
  • [8] CHARACTERIZATION OF THE POINT SPREAD FUNCTION AND MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION OF SCATTERED RADIATION USING A DIGITAL IMAGING-SYSTEM
    BOONE, JM
    ARNOLD, BA
    SEIBERT, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 13 (02) : 254 - 256
  • [9] AN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE SCATTERED RADIATION DISTRIBUTION IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY
    BOONE, JM
    SEIBERT, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (05) : 721 - 725
  • [10] Technical and clinical results of an experimental Flat Dynamic (digital) X-ray image Detector (FDXD) system with real-time corrections
    Bruijns, TJC
    Alving, PL
    Baker, EL
    Bury, R
    Cowen, AR
    Jung, N
    Luijendijk, HA
    Meulenbrugge, HJ
    Stouten, HJ
    [J]. PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 3336 : 33 - 44