The response of a MOSFET, p-type semiconductor and LiF TLD to quasi-monoenergetic x-rays

被引:53
作者
Edwards, CR
Green, S
Palethorpe, JE
Mountford, PJ
机构
[1] N Staffordshire Hosp, Royal Infirm, Dept Biomed Engn & Med Phys, Stoke On Trent ST4 7LN, Staffs, England
[2] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Reg Radiat Phys & Protect Serv, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/006
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A metal oxide semiconductor held effect transistor (MOSFET), p-type semiconductor and a TLD can all be used for x-ray dosimetry, with each system having the common disadvantage of a response which is dependent upon the incident photon energy, particularly for energies <1 MeV. A Pantak HF-320 quasi-monoenergetic x-ray unit was used to determine the response of two Thomson and Nielson TN-502RD MOSFETs, a Scanditronix EDP-10 semiconductor (build-up cap 10 mm: tissue equivalence), an EDD-5 semiconductor (build-up cap 4.5 mm: tissue equivalence) and an LiF:Mg:Ti TLD over the energy range 12-208 keV. The sensitivity of each detector was normalized to the value produced by exposure to 6 MV x-rays. The maximum relative sensitivities of the two MOSFET detectors were 4.19 +/- 0.25 and 4.44 +/- 0.26 respectively, occurring at an incident x-ray energy of 33 keV. The maximum relative sensitivity of the Scanditronix EDP-10 of 2.24 +/- 0.13 occurred at 65 keV, and for the EDD-5, it was 7.72 +/- 0.45 at 48 keV. The TLD produced a maximum relative sensitivity of 1.31 +/- 0.09 at 33 keV. Compared with available data based on heteroenergetic x-ray sources, these measurements have identified a more representative response for each detector to low-energy x-rays.
引用
收藏
页码:2383 / 2391
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF SEMICONDUCTOR AND THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS FOR INVIVO DOSIMETRY [J].
AUKETT, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (766) :947-952
[2]   CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS OF SCATTERED DOSE ASSOCIATED WITH RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
CUMBERLIN, RL ;
DRITSCHILO, A ;
MOSSMAN, KL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (03) :623-629
[3]   AN ANALYTIC CALCULATION OF THE ENERGY FLUENCE SPECTRUM OF A LINEAR-ACCELERATOR [J].
DESOBRY, GE ;
BOYER, AL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (12) :1943-1952
[4]   A survey of current in vivo radiotherapy dosimetry practice [J].
Edwards, CR ;
Grieveson, MH ;
Mountford, PJ ;
Rolfe, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 :299-302
[5]  
FADDEGON BA, 1991, MED PHYS, V18, P773
[6]   CALCULATION OF THE DOSE DELIVERED TO ORGANS OUTSIDE THE RADIATION BEAMS [J].
FRANCOIS, P ;
BEURTHERET, C ;
DUTREIX, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (06) :879-883
[7]   THE ROLE OF IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY [J].
GARAVAGLIA, G ;
JOHANSSON, KA ;
LEUNENS, G ;
MIJNHEER, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) :281-282
[8]   AUTOMATED DATA-COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR MOSFET RADIATION DETECTORS [J].
GLADSTONE, DJ ;
CHIN, LM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (03) :542-548
[9]   Development of a calibration facility for test instrumentation in diagnostic radiology [J].
Green, S ;
Palethorpe, JE ;
Peach, DE ;
Bradley, DA .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1996, 67 (01) :41-46
[10]  
HOLMESSIEDLE A, 1986, RADIAT PHYS CHEM, V28, P235