Does labour supply respond to a flat tax?

被引:10
作者
Duncan, Denvil [1 ]
Peter, Klara Sabirianova [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] IZA Bonn, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Labour supply; personal income tax; flat tax; labour supply elasticity; difference-in-difference; regression discontinuity; wage endogeneity; employment participation; Russia; transition; DIRECT FOREIGN-INVESTMENT; DOMESTIC FIRMS; TAXABLE INCOME; REFORM-ACT; PANEL-DATA; SPILLOVERS; ELASTICITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00383.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We exploit the exogenous change in marginal tax rates created by the Russian flat tax reform of 2001 to identify the effect of taxes on the labour supply of men and women. We apply a weighted difference-in-difference regression approach and instrumental variables to estimate labour supply functions using a panel dataset. The mean regression results indicate that the tax reform led to a statistically significant increase in hours of work for men but had no effect on work hours for women. However, we find a positive response to tax changes in both tails of the female work hour distribution. We also find that the reform increased the probability of finding a job among both men and women. Despite significant variation in individual responses, the aggregate labour supply elasticities are trivial. This suggests that reform-induced changes in labour supply are an unlikely explanation for the amplified personal income tax revenues that followed the reform.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 404
页数:40
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[2]   LABOR SUPPLY, HOURS CONSTRAINTS, AND JOB MOBILITY [J].
ALTONJI, JG ;
PAXSON, CH .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1992, 27 (02) :256-278
[3]  
ARELLANO M, 1987, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V49, P431
[4]  
BLUNDELL R, 1999, HDB LABOR EC A, V3, P1550
[5]   Institutional determinants of labor reallocation in transition [J].
Boeri, T ;
Terrell, K .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (01) :51-76
[6]   THE EMPLOYER SIZE WAGE EFFECT [J].
BROWN, C ;
MEDOFF, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (05) :1027-1059
[8]   Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory [J].
Dhami, Sanjit ;
al-Nowaihi, Ali .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 64 (01) :171-192
[9]   Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit [J].
Eissa, N ;
Liebman, JB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (02) :605-637
[10]   THE EFFECT OF MARGINAL TAX RATES ON TAXABLE INCOME - A PANEL STUDY OF THE 1986 TAX-REFORM ACT [J].
FELDSTEIN, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1995, 103 (03) :551-572