Incentive Mechanism Design for Crowdsourcing: An All-Pay Auction Approach

被引:57
作者
Luo, Tie [1 ]
Das, Sajal K. [2 ]
Tan, Hwee Pink [3 ]
Xia, Lirong [4 ]
机构
[1] ASTAR, Inst Infocomm Res, Singapore 138632, Singapore
[2] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Singapore 178902, Singapore
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Mobile crowd sensing; participatory sensing; incomplete information; risk aversion; Bayesian Nash equilibrium; shading effect; ALLOCATION; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1145/2837029
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Crowdsourcing can be modeled as a principal-agent problem in which the principal (crowdsourcer) desires to solicit a maximal contribution from a group of agents (participants) while agents are only motivated to act according to their own respective advantages. To reconcile this tension, we propose an all-pay auction approach to incentivize agents to act in the principal's interest, i.e., maximizing profit, while allowing agents to reap strictly positive utility. Our rationale for advocating all-pay auctions is based on two merits that we identify, namely all-pay auctions (i) compress the common, two-stage "bid-contribute" crowdsourcing process into a single "bid-cum-contribute" stage, and (ii) eliminate the risk of task nonfulfillment. In our proposed approach, we enhance all-pay auctions with two additional features: an adaptive prize and a general crowdsourcing environment. The prize or reward adapts itself as per a function of the unknown winning agent's contribution, and the environment or setting generally accommodates incomplete and asymmetric information, risk-averse (and risk-neutral) agents, and a stochastic (and deterministic) population. We analytically derive this all-pay auction-based mechanism and extensively evaluate it in comparison to classic and optimized mechanisms. The results demonstrate that our proposed approach remarkably outperforms its counterparts in terms of the principal's profit, agent's utility, and social welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Optimal Prizes for All-Pay Contests in Heterogeneous Crowdsourcing [J].
Luo, Tie ;
Kanhere, Salil S. ;
Das, Sajal K. ;
Tan, Hwee-Pink .
2014 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AD HOC AND SENSOR SYSTEMS (MASS), 2014, :136-144
[32]  
Luo T, 2014, IEEE INFOCOM SER, P127, DOI 10.1109/INFOCOM.2014.6847932
[33]  
Luo T, 2014, IEEE INT CONF SENS, P636, DOI 10.1109/SAHCN.2014.6990404
[34]  
Luo Tie, 2016, IEEE T MOBILE COMPUT
[35]   AUCTIONS WITH A STOCHASTIC NUMBER OF BIDDERS [J].
MCAFEE, RP ;
MCMILLAN, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1987, 43 (01) :1-19
[36]   The optimal allocation of prizes in contests [J].
Moldovanu, B ;
Sela, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (03) :542-558
[37]   OPTIMAL AUCTION DESIGN [J].
MYERSON, RB .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1981, 6 (01) :58-73
[38]  
Restuccia F., 2014, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Inter-national Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, P1
[39]   Quality of Contributed Service and Market Equilibrium for Participatory Sensing [J].
Tham, Chen-Khong ;
Luo, Tie .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2015, 14 (04) :829-842
[40]   Fairness and social welfare in service allocation schemes for participatory sensing [J].
Tham, Chen-Khong ;
Luo, Tie .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2014, 73 :58-71