Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model

被引:23
作者
Anishchenko, Ivan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kundrotas, Petras J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vakser, Ilya A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Computat Biol Program, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Mol Biosci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biochem, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
STATISTICAL POTENTIALS; ENERGY FUNCTIONS; SCORING FUNCTIONS; STABILITY CHANGES; FORCE-FIELD; MEAN FORCE; DOCKING; FOLD; CONFORMATIONS; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.035
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 [生物物理学];
摘要
The energy function is the key component of protein modeling methodology. This work presents a semianalytical approach to the development of contact potentials for protein structure modeling. Residue-residue and atom-atom contact energies were derived by maximizing the probability of observing native sequences in a nonredundant set of protein structures. The optimization task was formulated as an inverse statistical mechanics problem applied to the Potts model. Its solution by pseudolikelihood maximization provides consistent estimates of coupling constants at atomic and residue levels. The best performance was achieved when interacting atoms were grouped according to their physicochemical properties. For individual protein structures, the performance of the contact potentials in distinguishing near-native structures from the decoys is similar to the top-performing scoring functions. The potentials also yielded significant improvement in the protein docking success rates. The potentials recapitulated experimentally determined protein stability changes upon point mutations and protein-protein binding affinities. The approach offers a different perspective on knowledge-based potentials and may serve as the basis for their further development.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 821
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]
Modeling complexes of modeled proteins [J].
Anishchenko, Ivan ;
Kundrotas, Petras J. ;
Vakser, Ilya A. .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 85 (03) :470-478
[2]
[Anonymous], 1980, J AMN STAT ASS
[3]
[Anonymous], 1980, MARKOV RANDOM FIELDS, DOI DOI 10.1090/CONM/001
[4]
Inverse Ising Inference Using All the Data [J].
Aurell, Erik ;
Ekeberg, Magnus .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2012, 108 (09)
[5]
Learning generative models for protein fold families [J].
Balakrishnan, Sivaraman ;
Kamisetty, Hetunandan ;
Carbonell, Jaime G. ;
Lee, Su-In ;
Langmead, Christopher James .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 79 (04) :1061-1078
[6]
ProTherm, version 4.0: thermodynamic database for proteins and mutants [J].
Bava, KA ;
Gromiha, MM ;
Uedaira, H ;
Kitajima, K ;
Sarai, A .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2004, 32 :D120-D121
[7]
Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: Are these meaningful potentials? [J].
BenNaim, A .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 107 (09) :3698-3706
[8]
Betancourt MR, 1999, PROTEIN SCI, V8, P361
[9]
Potential energy functions for protein design [J].
Boas, F. Edward ;
Harbury, Pehr B. .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) :199-204
[10]
Fast optimization of statistical potentials for structurally constrained phylogenetic models [J].
Bonnard, Cecile ;
Kleinman, Claudia L. ;
Rodrigue, Nicolas ;
Lartillot, Nicolas .
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2009, 9