The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect

被引：344

作者：

Dechene, Alice ^{[1
]}

Stahl, Christoph ^{[2
]}

Hansen, Jochim

Waenke, Michaela

机构：

[1] Univ Basel, Dept Psychol, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland

[2] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

来源：

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW | 2010年 / 14卷 / 02期

关键词：

truth effect; meta-analysis; processing fluency; DISCREPANCY-ATTRIBUTION HYPOTHESIS; PERCEPTUAL FLUENCY; ADVERTISING REPETITION; MISATTRIBUTION ERRORS; PROCESSING FLUENCY; FAMILIARITY; MEMORY; EXPOSURE; FEELINGS; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1177/1088868309352251

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Repetition has been shown to increase subjective truth ratings of trivia statements. This truth effect can be measured in two ways: (a) as the increase in subjective truth from the first to the second encounter (within-items criterion) and (b) as the difference in truth ratings between repeated and other new statements (between-items criterion). Qualitative differences are assumed between the processes underlying both criteria. A meta-analysis of the truth effect was conducted that compared the two criteria. In all, 51 studies of the repetition-induced truth effect were included in the analysis. Results indicate that the between-items effect is larger than the within-items effect. Moderator analyses reveal that several moderators affect both effects differentially. This lends support to the notion that different psychological comparison processes may underlie the two effects. The results are discussed within the processing fluency account of the truth effect.

引用

页码：238 / 257

页数：20

共 88 条

[31]

Gardiner J.M., 2000, OXFORD HDB MEMORY, P229, DOI DOI 10.1002/ACP.822

[32] EXTERNAL VALIDITY OF LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS - THE FREQUENCY-VALIDITY RELATIONSHIP [J].

GIGERENZER, G .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 97 (02) :185-195

[33] YOU CANT NOT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ [J].

GILBERT, DT ;

TAFARODI, RW ;

MALONE, PS .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (02) :221-233

[34] UNBELIEVING THE UNBELIEVABLE - SOME PROBLEMS IN THE REJECTION OF FALSE INFORMATION [J].

GILBERT, DT ;

KRULL, DS ;

MALONE, PS .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 59 (04) :601-613

[35] AUDIENCE INVOLVEMENT IN ADVERTISING - 4 LEVELS [J].

GREENWALD, AG ;

LEAVITT, C .

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1984, 11 (01) :581-592

[36] It's the difference that counts:: Expectancy/experience discrepancy moderates the use of ease of retrieval in attitude judgments [J].

Hansen, Jochim ;

Waenke, Michaela .

SOCIAL COGNITION, 2008, 26 (04) :447-468

[37] Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth [J].

Hansen, Jochim ;

Dechene, Alice ;

Waenke, Michaela .

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (03) :687-691

[38] FREQUENCY AND CONFERENCE OF REFERENTIAL VALIDITY [J].

HASHER, L ;

GOLDSTEIN, D ;

TOPPINO, T .

JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1977, 16 (01) :107-112

[39] LOW-INVOLVEMENT LEARNING - MEMORY WITHOUT EVALUATION [J].

HAWKINS, SA ;

HOCH, SJ .

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1992, 19 (02) :212-225

[40] Low-involvement learning: Repetition and coherence in familiarity and belief [J].

Hawkins, SA ;

Hoch, SJ ;

Meyers-Levy, J .

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 11 (01) :1-11

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →