Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: Bolus tracking with a 40-detector CT scanner to time arterial phase imaging

被引:70
作者
Sultana, Shamima [1 ]
Awai, Kazuo [1 ]
Nakayama, Yoshiharu [1 ]
Nakaura, Takeshi [1 ]
Liu, Duo [1 ]
Hatemura, Masahiro [1 ]
Funama, Yoshinori [1 ]
Morishita, Shoji [1 ]
Yamashita, Yasuyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2431060069
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate prospectively bolus tracking to time hepatic arterial phase (HAP) imaging of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with a 40-detector computed tomographic (CT) scanner. Materials and Methods: This study received institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained. The study included 192 patients ( 123 men, 69 women; mean age, 67.6 years) with known or suspected HCC who underwent dynamic CT, including HAP scanning; CT depicted 111 hypervascular HCCs in 72 patients. Scanning was performed with a 40-detector CT scanner, and bolus tracking was used to time the start of HAP imaging. Patients were randomly assigned to five protocols; HAP scanning was started at a specified interval after trigger threshold was reached: 9 seconds ( protocol A), 12 seconds ( protocol B), 15 seconds ( protocol C), 18 seconds ( protocol D), or 21 seconds ( protocol E). Trigger threshold level was set at 100 HU above aortic baseline CT number. Enhancement values in the aorta and the tumor-liver contrast (TLC) were measured. Dunnett multiple comparisons were performed to compare enhancement values among the five protocols. Results: Mean scanning time for the whole liver was 2.1 seconds. Mean enhancement value of the aorta in protocols A, B, C, D, and E were 284.3 HU +/- 54.7, 293.8 HU +/- 51.0, 308.7 HU +/- 55.9, 291.5 HU +/- 42.2, and 235.5 HU +/- 51.2, respectively. Aortic enhancement was significantly lower in protocol E than in protocol A ( P < .01); there was no significant difference between protocols A and B, A and C, and A and D. Mean TLCs in protocols A, B, C, D, and E were 23.4 HU +/- 7.6, 35.5 HU +/- 14.0, 36.2 HU +/- 6.8, 47.2 HU +/- 19.2, and 35.1 HU +/- 15.8, respectively. A significant difference was found only between protocols A and D (P < .01). Conclusion: Peak TLC during the HAP occurred 18 seconds after triggering.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 147
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight [J].
Awai, K ;
Hiraishi, K ;
Hori, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (01) :142-150
[2]
Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: When does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model [J].
Bae, KT .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) :809-816
[3]
Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part I. Prediction with a computer model [J].
Bae, KT ;
Heiken, JP ;
Brink, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :647-655
[4]
Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: Effect of contrast medium injection rate - Pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model [J].
Bae, KT ;
Heiken, JP ;
Brink, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (02) :455-464
[5]
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT [J].
Baron, RL ;
Oliver, JH ;
Dodd, GD ;
Nalesnik, M ;
Holbert, BL ;
Carr, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) :505-511
[7]
HEPATIC SPIRAL CT - REDUCTION OF DOSE OF INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST MATERIAL [J].
BRINK, JA ;
HEIKEN, JP ;
FORMAN, HP ;
SAGEL, SS ;
MOLINA, PL ;
BROWN, PC .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (01) :83-88
[8]
CHOI BI, 1995, CANCER, V76, P2434, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19951215)76:12<2434::AID-CNCR2820761206>3.0.CO
[9]
2-G
[10]
Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner [J].
Foley, WD ;
Mallisee, TA ;
Hohenwalter, MD ;
Wilson, CR ;
Quiroz, FA ;
Taylor, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (03) :679-685