Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume

被引:82
作者
Cicuttini, FM
Forbes, A
Asbeutah, A
Morris, K
Stuckey, S
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Dept Magnet Resonance Imaging, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Prahran, Vic, Australia
[3] Australian Comp & Commun Inst, Carlton, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100180410
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quantitation of articular cartilage by magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction has been validated and is likely to be a useful outcome measure in clinical trials of arthritis. The cost of magnetic resonance imaging is largely dependent on scanning time. The aim of this study was to compare a fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence magnetic resonance imaging scanning protocol, which takes 5 minutes and 44 seconds, with the standard, previously validated spoiled gradient-echo sequence protocol, which takes 11 minutes and 56 seconds, in the measurement of knee cartilage volume. Cartilage volumes calculated from the standard and fast magnetic resonance imaging sequences were similar. The median absolute percentage overestimation or underestimation of the cartilage volume with the fast sequence for 10 normal subjects was 2.5, 4.1, and 3.256 for patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilage, respectively for eight subjects with osteoarthritis, the percentages were 4.3 and 3.9% for femoral and tibial cartilage, respectively. The fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence protocol had very high intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility in normal subjects and in those with osteoarthritis. Because the cost of magnetic resonance imaging scanning is largely determined by scan time, the faster scanning protocol means that the cost of estimates of knee cartilage volume can be significantly reduced, thus increasing the feasibility of this methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 584
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Forbes, A ;
Morris, K ;
Darling, S ;
Bailey, M ;
Stuckey, S .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1999, 7 (03) :265-271
[2]
Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Adam, C ;
Sittek, H ;
Becker, C ;
Milz, S ;
Schulte, E ;
Reiser, M ;
Putz, R .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 30 (03) :285-289
[3]
In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Westhoff, J ;
Sittek, H ;
Maag, KP ;
Haubner, M ;
Faber, S ;
Englmeier, KH ;
Reiser, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (03) :593-597
[4]
Efron B, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, P178
[5]
RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF OSTEO-ARTHROSIS [J].
KELLGREN, JH ;
LAWRENCE, JS .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1957, 16 (04) :494-502
[6]
Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction [J].
Marshall, KW ;
Mikulis, DJ ;
Guthrie, BM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1995, 13 (06) :814-823
[7]
Milliken GA, 1984, ANAL MESSY DATA, VI, P211
[8]
QUANTIFICATION OF ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE IN THE KNEE WITH PULSED SATURATION-TRANSFER SUBTRACTION AND FAT-SUPPRESSED MR-IMAGING - OPTIMIZATION AND VALIDATION [J].
PETERFY, CG ;
VANDIJKE, CF ;
JANZEN, DL ;
GLUER, CC ;
NAMBA, R ;
MAJUMDAR, S ;
LANG, P ;
GENANT, HK .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (02) :485-491
[9]
PILCH L, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P2307
[10]
Articular cartilage volume in the knee: Semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images [J].
Piplani, MA ;
Disler, DG ;
McCauley, TR ;
Holmes, TJ ;
Cousins, JP .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (03) :855-859