The Kirkwood-Buff theory and the effect of cosolvents on biochemical reactions

被引:111
作者
Shimizu, S [1 ]
Boon, CL
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Chem, York Struct Biol Lab, York YO10 5YW, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Windsor, Dept Phys, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1806402
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cosolvents added to aqueous solutions of biomolecules profoundly affect protein stability, as well as biochemical equilibria. Some cosolvents, such as urea and guanidine hydrochloride, denature proteins, whereas others, such as osmolytes and crowders, stabilize the native structures of proteins. The way cosolvents interact with biomolecules is crucial information required to understand the cosolvent effect at a molecular level. We present a statistical mechanical framework based upon Kirkwood-Buff theory, which enables one to extract this picture from experimental data. The combination of two experimental results, namely, the cosolvent-induced equilibrium shift and the partial molar volume change upon the reaction, supplimented by the structural change, is shown to yield the number of water and cosolvent molecules bound or released during a reaction. Previously, denaturation experiments (e.g., m-value analysis) were analyzed by empirical and stoichiometric solvent-binding models, while the effects of osmolytes and crowders were analyzed by the approximate molecular crowding approach for low cosolvent concentration. Here we synthesize these previous approaches in a rigorous statistical mechanical treatment, which is applicable at any cosolvent concentration. The usefulness and accuracy of previous approaches was also evaluated. (C) 2004 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:9147 / 9155
页数:9
相关论文
共 89 条
[71]   Origins of protein denatured state compactness and hydrophobic clustering in aqueous urea: Inferences from nonpolar potentials of mean force [J].
Shimizu, S ;
Chan, HS .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 49 (04) :560-566
[72]   Alcohol denaturation: Thermodynamic theory of peptide unit solvation [J].
Shimizu, S ;
Shimizu, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 121 (11) :2387-2394
[73]   Kirkwood-Buff integrals in aqueous alcohol systems: Comparison between thermodynamic calculations and X-ray scattering experiments [J].
Shulgin, I ;
Ruckenstein, E .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 1999, 103 (13) :2496-2503
[74]   Impact of urea on water structure: a clue to its properties as a denaturant? [J].
Soper, AK ;
Castner, EW ;
Luzar, A .
BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 105 (2-3) :649-666
[75]  
Tanford C, 1970, Adv Protein Chem, V24, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60241-7
[76]   In disperse solution, "osmotic stress" is a restricted case of preferential interactions [J].
Timasheff, SN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (13) :7363-7367
[77]   Protein-solvent preferential interactions, protein hydration, and the modulation of biochemical reactions by solvent components [J].
Timasheff, SN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (15) :9721-9726
[78]  
Timasheff SN, 1998, ADV PROTEIN CHEM, V51, P355
[79]   Keeping the shape but changing the charges: A simulation study of urea and its iso-steric analogs [J].
Tsai, J ;
Gerstein, M ;
Levitt, M .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (23) :9417-9430
[80]   Entropic contributions in cosolvent binding to hydrophobic solutes in water [J].
van der Vegt, NFA ;
van Gunsteren, WF .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2004, 108 (03) :1056-1064