Evaluation of Irrigant Flow in the Root Canal Using Different Needle Types by an Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics Model

被引:135
作者
Boutsioukis, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Verhaagen, Bram [3 ,4 ]
Versluis, Michel [3 ,4 ]
Kastrinakis, Eleftherios [5 ]
Wesselink, Paul R. [2 ]
van der Sluis, Lucas W. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Dent, Dept Endodontol, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Cariol, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Sci & Technol, Phys Fluids Grp, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Res Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med MIRA, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Engn, Dept Chem Engn, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Computational Fluid Dynamics; irrigation; needle; tip; EX-VIVO; DIMENSIONS; EFFICACY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of needle tip design on the irrigant flow inside a prepared root canal during final irrigation with a syringe using a validated Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model. Methods: A CFD model was created to simulate the irrigant flow inside a prepared root canal. Six different types of 30-G needles, three open-ended needles and three close-ended needles, were tested. Using this CFD model, the irrigant flow in the apical root canal was calculated and visualized. As a result, the streaming velocity, the apical pressure, and the shear stress on the root canal wall were evaluated. Results: The open-ended needles created a jet toward the apex and maximum irrigant replacement. Within this group, the notched needle appeared less efficient in terms of irrigant replacement than the other two types. Within the close-ended group, the side-vented and double side-vented needle created a series of vortices and a less efficient irrigant replacement; the side-vented needle was slightly more efficient. The multi-vented needle created almost no flow apically to its tip, and wall shear stress was concentrated on a limited area, but the apical pressure was significantly lower than the other types. Conclusions: The flow pattern of the open-ended needles was different from the close-ended needles, resulting in more irrigant replacement in front of the open-ended needles but also higher apical pressure. (J Endod 2010;36:875-879)
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 879
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A validated computational fluid dynamics model to estimate hemolysis in a rotary blood pump [J].
Arvand, A ;
Hormes, M ;
Reul, H .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2005, 29 (07) :531-540
[2]   Clinical relevance of standardization of endodontic irrigation needle dimensions according to the ISO 9626:1991 and 9626:1991/Amd 1:2001 specification [J].
Boutsioukis, C. ;
Lambrianidis, T. ;
Vasiliadis, L. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2007, 40 (09) :700-706
[3]   Measurement of pressure and flow rates during irrigation of a root canal ex vivo with three endodontic needles [J].
Boutsioukis, C. ;
Lambrianidis, T. ;
Kastrinakis, E. ;
Bekiaroglou, P. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2007, 40 (07) :504-513
[4]   Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study [J].
Boutsioukis, C. ;
Lambrianidis, T. ;
Kastrinakis, E. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2009, 42 (02) :144-155
[5]  
BOUTSIOUKIS C, INT ENDOD J IN PRESS
[6]  
*DISC DENT, 2009, ENDOVAC AP NEG PRESS, P1
[7]   SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE STUDY OF A NEW IRRIGATION METHOD IN ENDODONTIC TREATMENT [J].
GOLDMAN, LB ;
GOLDMAN, M ;
KRONMAN, JH ;
LIN, PS .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1979, 48 (01) :79-83
[8]  
Goldman M, 1976, J Endod, V2, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(76)80085-4
[9]  
Haapasalo M., 2005, ENDODONTIC TOPICS, V10, P77, DOI [10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1601-1546.2005.00135.X]
[10]   A bio-molecular film ex-vivo model to evaluate the influence of canal dimensions and irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation [J].
Huang, T. -Y. ;
Gulabivala, K. ;
Ng, Y. -L. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2008, 41 (01) :60-71