Chest radiographic image quality: Comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems - Preliminary study

被引:9
作者
Beute, GH
Flynn, MJ
Eyler, WR
Samei, E
Spizarny, DL
Zylak, CJ
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Nucl Engn & Radiol Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
radiography; comparative studies; selenium detector; storage phosphor; thorax;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599395
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Conventional screen-film radiography does not display all regions of the thorax satisfactorily. Three chest radiographic techniques display both the lung and the mediastinum with good contrast. These techniques are asymmetric screen-film (ASF), digital storage phosphor (DSP), and digital selenium drum (DSD) imaging. ASF systems use two asymmetric screen-film combinations to produce a wide-latitude image of the thorax with good contrast in the lungs. In DSP systems, image data are acquired digitally with a wide dynamic range by using the optical output of a photostimulable phosphor plate; in DSD systems, the wide-range digital image data are acquired by using the electronic charge generated on a drum coated with a thin layer of amorphous selenium, The appearance of a DSP or DSD radiograph is then determined by user-selected image processing operations: tone scaling, spatial frequency processing, and dynamic range compensation. Digital chest radiographs processed with strong regional equalization provide both excellent contrast in the lungs and effective display of the mediastinum and chest wall. At visual comparison, the high lung contrast and good mediastinal, retrocardiac, and subdiaphragmatic detail provided by the DSD method distinguish it from the other two methods.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 754
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BUSCH HP, 1992, EUR RADIOL, V2, P335
[2]   DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF UNPROCESSED AND PROCESSED IMAGES IN THE DETECTION OF SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES [J].
CORREA, J ;
SOUTO, M ;
TAHOCES, PG ;
MALAGARI, KS ;
TUCKER, DM ;
LARKIN, JJ ;
KUHLMAN, J ;
BARNES, GT ;
ZERHOUNI, EA ;
FRASER, RG ;
VIDAL, JJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) :253-258
[3]   THRESHOLD PERCEPTION PERFORMANCE WITH COMPUTED AND SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR CHEST RADIOGRAPHY [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
RICE, JJ ;
BEAM, CA ;
RAVIN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :179-187
[4]   SELENIUM-BASED DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST - RADIOLOGISTS PREFERENCE COMPARED WITH FILM-SCREEN RADIOGRAPHS [J].
FLOYD, CE ;
BAKER, JA ;
CHOTAS, HG ;
DELONG, DM ;
RAVIN, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (06) :1353-1358
[5]  
Kehler M, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P332
[6]   INTERPRETATION OF SUBTLE INTERSTITIAL LUNG ABNORMALITIES - CONVENTIONAL VERSUS STORAGE PHOSPHOR RADIOGRAPHY [J].
KIDO, S ;
IKEZOE, J ;
TAKEUCHI, N ;
KONDOH, H ;
TOMIYAMA, N ;
JOKOH, T ;
KOHNO, N ;
TAKASHIMA, S ;
YAMAGAMI, H ;
NAITO, H ;
ARISAWA, J ;
MORIMOTO, S ;
KOZUKA, T .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (02) :527-533
[7]   DETECTION OF SIMULATED CHEST LESIONS - COMPARISON OF A CONVENTIONAL SCREEN-FILM COMBINATION, AN ASYMMETRIC SCREEN-FILM SYSTEM, AND STORAGE PHOSPHOR RADIOGRAPHY [J].
LEPPERT, AGA ;
PROKOP, M ;
SCHAEFERPROKOP, CM ;
GALANSKI, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) :259-263
[8]   DIRECT COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY WITH A DUAL-IMAGE RECORDING TECHNIQUE [J].
MACMAHON, H ;
SANADA, S ;
DOI, K ;
GIGER, M ;
XU, XW ;
YIN, FF ;
MONTNER, SM ;
CARLIN, M .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1991, 11 (02) :259-268
[9]  
NICKLASON LT, 1993, RADIOLOGY, V186, P387
[10]   Comparison of observer performance for real and simulated nodules in chest radiography [J].
Samei, E ;
Flynn, MJ ;
Beute, GH ;
Peterson, E .
IMAGE PERCEPTION - MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2712 :60-70