Internal fixation strength of suture anchors - Update 1997

被引:86
作者
Barber, FA [1 ]
Herbert, MA [1 ]
Click, JN [1 ]
机构
[1] MED CITY DALLAS HOSP,ADV SURG INST,DALLAS,TX
来源
ARTHROSCOPY | 1997年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
suture anchor; biodegradable; PLLA; mini anchors; ultimate load;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90034-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two new areas of anchor development are biodegradable anchors and ''mini'' anchors. The group of biodegradable anchors tested include the Bio-Anchor, LactoSorb, Biofix, Bio-Statak, Mini Screw suture anchor, DePuy 4.5 molded, DePuy 4.5 machined, DePuy 3.5 machined, TAG Wedge 4, TAG Rod 2, TAG Wedge 3, TAG Wedge 2, and Stealth. ''Mini anchors'' have drill holes or minor diameters of <2.2 mm. Those tested include the Mini Revo and Bio-Anchor, miniHarpoon, mini Mitek and Fast in 3, Statak 1.5 and 2.5, SB 2 and PeBA. 3, Corkscrew 5, Corkscrew 3.5, and Fastak A2, Ogden 2.5, TAG Wedge 2, ROC 1.9, and Questus 2.5. Additional anchors tested that fit neither category include the Anspach, Questus 3.5 and 5.0, SE 3 and PeBA-C, Ogden 3.5, Fast in 4, Ultrafix, and the ROC 3.5, ROC 2.8, ROC 2.3, and ROC XS. An anchor comparison, using an established protocol in fresh porcine femurs, recorded failure strength, failure mode, eyelet size, minor and major diameters, and drill hole sizes. Except for the Bio-Anchor and TAG Wedge 2, biodegradable anchors tend to be larger to compensate for their lower strength relative to metal. Biodegradable screw anchors' predominant failure mode was eyelet cutout, whereas biodegradable nonscrew anchors failed predominantly by anchor pullout. From an initial mechanical perspective, these biodegradable anchors perform acceptably. Both biodegradable and ''mini'' anchors include screw and nonscrew designs. As expected, screw designs perform well and generally fail at higher loads than nonscrew anchors. Although biodegradable anchors, as a group, are not as strong as metal anchors, they are stronger than the sutures for which they are designed. The move to smaller (''mini'') and biodegradable anchors is supported by these data. Whether an anchor fails at twice the suture breaking strength or 10 times the suture breaking strength should make no difference.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 362
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   THE ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF SUTURE ANCHORS [J].
BARBER, FA ;
HERBERT, MA ;
CLICK, JN .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (01) :21-28
[2]   The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location: A cadaveric study [J].
Barber, FA ;
Feder, SM ;
Burkhart, SS ;
Ahrens, J .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1997, 13 (03) :340-345
[3]   SUTURE ANCHOR FAILURE STRENGTH - AN IN-VIVO STUDY [J].
BARBER, FA ;
CAWLEY, P ;
PRUDICH, JF .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1993, 9 (06) :647-652
[4]   Suture anchor strength revisited [J].
Barber, FA ;
Herbert, MA ;
Click, JN .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (01) :32-38
[5]   REPAIR OF AVULSED INSERTION OF BICEPS - A NEW TECHNIQUE IN 4 CASES [J].
BARNES, SJ ;
COLEMAN, SG ;
GILPIN, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (06) :938-939
[6]  
BARTLETT EC, 1993, ARTHR ASS N AM ANN M
[7]  
Berg E E, 1996, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V5, P76, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(96)80035-8
[8]  
BOVARD RS, 1994, ORTHOP REV, P167
[9]  
BURKHART SS, 1996, 15 ANN ARTHR ASS N A
[10]   PULL-OUT STRENGTH OF 5 SUTURE ANCHORS [J].
CARPENTER, JE ;
FISH, DN ;
HUSTON, LJ ;
GOLDSTEIN, SA .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1993, 9 (01) :109-113