A quantitative comparison of two methods to correct eddy current-induced distortions in DT-MRI

被引:14
作者
Munoz Maniega, Susana [1 ]
Bastin, Mark E. [1 ]
Armitage, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion tensor; eddy currents; image registration; principal component analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Eddy current-induced geometric distortions of single-shot, diffusion-weighted, echo-planar (DW-EP) images are a major confounding factor to the accurate determination of water diffusion parameters in diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI). Previously, it has been suggested that these geometric distortions can be removed from brain DW-EP images using affine transformations determined from phantom calibration experiments using iterative cross-correlation (ICC). Since this approach was first described, a number of image-based registration methods have become available that can also correct eddy current-induced distortions in DW-EP images. However, as yet no study has investigated whether separate eddy current calibration or image-based registration provides the most accurate way of retrieving these artefacts from DT-MRI data. Here we compare how ICC phantom calibration and affine FLIRT (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk), a popular image-based multimodal registration method that can correct both eddy current-induced distortions and bulk subject motion, perform when registering DW-EP images acquired with different slice thicknesses (2.8 and 5 mm) and b-values (1000 and 3000 s/mm(2)). With the use of consistency testing, it was found that ICC was a more robust algorithm for correcting eddy current-induced distortions than affine FLIRT, especially at high b-value and small slice thickness. In addition, principal component analysis demonstrated that the combination of ICC phantom calibration (to remove eddy current-induced distortions) with rigid body FLIRT (to remove bulk subject motion) provided a more accurate registration of DT-MRI data than that achieved by affine FLIRT. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Elimination of eddy current artifacts in diffusion-weighted echo-planar images: The use of bipolar gradients [J].
Alexander, AL ;
Tsuruda, JS ;
Parker, DL .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (06) :1016-1021
[2]   A model-based method for retrospective correction of geometric distortions in diffusion-weighted EPI [J].
Andersson, JLR ;
Skare, S .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (01) :177-199
[3]   A simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR images [J].
Basser, PJ ;
Pierpaoli, C .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 39 (06) :928-934
[4]   Correction of eddy current-induced artefacts in diffusion tensor imaging using iterative cross-correlation [J].
Bastin, ME .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (07) :1011-1024
[5]   On the use of the FLAIR technique to improve the correction of eddy current induced artefacts in MR diffusion tensor imaging [J].
Bastin, ME .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 19 (07) :937-950
[6]   On the use of water phantom images to calibrate and correct eddy current induced artefacts in MR diffusion tensor imaging [J].
Bastin, ME ;
Armitage, PA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (06) :681-687
[7]   Eddy current correction in diffusion-weighted imaging using pairs of images acquired with opposite diffusion gradient polarity [J].
Bodammer, N ;
Kaufmann, J ;
Kanowski, M ;
Tempelmann, C .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (01) :188-193
[8]  
Calamante F, 1999, MAGN RESON MED, V41, P95, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199901)41:1<95::AID-MRM14>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-T
[10]   Correction for distortion of echo-planar images used to calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient [J].
Haselgrove, JC ;
Moore, JR .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (06) :960-964