Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Comparison of Standard HiRes and HiRes 120 Sound Processing

被引:73
作者
Firszt, Jill B. [1 ]
Holden, Laura K. [1 ]
Reeder, Ruth M. [1 ]
Skinner, Margaret W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Current steering; Sound processing; Speech recognition; STIMULATION RATE; CODING STRATEGY; PERFORMANCE; THRESHOLDS; PERCEPTION; NUMBER; NOISE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181924ff8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: HiRes (HR) 120 is a sound-processing strategy purported to offer an increase in the precision of frequency-to-place mapping through the use of current steering. This within-subject study was designed to compare speech recognition as well as music and sound quality ratings for HR and HR 120 processing. Setting: Cochlear implant/tertiary referral center. Subjects: Eight postlinguistically deafened adults implanted with an Advanced Bionics CII or HR 90K cochlear implant. Study Design/Main Outcome Measures: Performance with HR and HR 120 was assessed during 4 test sessions with a battery of measures including monosyllabic words, sentences in quiet and in noise, and ratings of sound quality and musical passages. Results: Compared with HR, speech recognition results in adult cochlear implant recipients revealed small but significant improvements with HR 120 for single syllable words and for 2 of 3 sentence recognition measures in noise. Both easy and more difficult sentence material presented in quiet were not significantly different between strategies. Additionally, music quality ratings were significantly better for HR 120 than for HR, and 7 of 8 subjects preferred HR 120 over HR for listening in everyday life. Conclusion: HR 120 may offer equivalent or improved benefit to patients compared with HR. Differences in performance on test measures between strategies are dependent on speech recognition materials and listening conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 152
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Evaluation of the harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120 [J].
Brendel, Martina ;
Buechner, Andreas ;
Krueger, Beate ;
Frohne-Buechner, Carolin ;
Lenarz, Thomas .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (02) :199-202
[2]   PREFERRED METHOD FOR CLINICAL DETERMINATION OF PURE-TONE THRESHOLDS [J].
CARHART, R ;
JERGER, JF .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1959, 24 (04) :330-345
[3]   Place-pitch discrimination of single-versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users [J].
Donaldson, GS ;
Kreft, HA ;
Litvak, L .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (02) :623-626
[4]   Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels [J].
Dunn, CC ;
Tyler, RS ;
Witt, SA ;
Gantz, BJ .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 115 (06) :425-432
[5]  
Etymotic Research, 2005, BKB SIN SPEECH IN NO
[6]   Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems [J].
Firszt, JB ;
Holden, LK ;
Skinner, MW ;
Tobey, EA ;
Peterson, A ;
Gaggl, W ;
Runge-Samuelson, CL ;
Wackym, PA .
EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (04) :375-387
[7]   Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients [J].
Firszt, Jill B. ;
Koch, Dawn Burton ;
Downing, Mark ;
Litvak, Leonid .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (05) :629-636
[8]   Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor [J].
Fishman, KE ;
Shannon, RV ;
Slattery, WH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (05) :1201-1215
[9]   Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants [J].
Friesen, LM ;
Shannon, RV ;
Cruz, RJ .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (03) :169-184
[10]   Effects of stimulation rate with the nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy [J].
Holden, LK ;
Skinner, MW ;
Holden, TA ;
Demorest, ME .
EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (05) :463-476