Current calibration, treatment, and treatment planning techniques among institutions participating in the Children's Oncology Group

被引:16
作者
Urie, M
FitzGerald, TJ
Followill, D
Laurie, F
Marcus, R
Michalski, J
机构
[1] Qual Assurance Review Ctr, Providence, RI 02908 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Washington Univ, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2003年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03827-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report current technology implementation, radiation therapy physics and treatment planning practices, and results of treatment planning exercises among 261 institutions belonging to the Children's Oncology Group (COG). Methods and Materials: The Radiation Therapy Committee of the newly formed COG mandated that each institution demonstrate basic physics and treatment planning abilities by satisfactorily completing a questionnaire and four treatment planning exercises designed by the Quality Assurance Review Center. The planning cases are (1) a maxillary sinus target volume (for two-dimensional planning), (2) a Hodgkin's disease mantle field (for irregular-field and off-axis dose calculations), (3) a central axis blocked case, and (4) a craniospinal irradiation case. The questionnaire and treatment plans were submitted (as of 1/30/02) by 243 institutions and completed satisfactorily by 233. Data from this questionnaire and analyses of the treatment plans with monitor unit calculations are presented. Results: Of the 243 clinics responding, 54% use multileaf collimators routinely, 94% use asymmetric jaws routinely, and 13% use dynamic wedges. Nearly all institutions calibrate their linear accelerators following American Association of Physicists in Medicine protocols, currently 16% with TG-51 and 81% with TG-21 protocol. Treatment planning systems are relied on very heavily for all calculations, including monitor units. Techniques and results of each of the treatment planning exercises are presented. Conclusions: Together, these data provide a unique compilation of current (2001) radiation therapy practices in institutions treating pediatric patients. Overall, the COG facilities have the equipment and the personnel to perform high-quality radiation therapy. With ongoing quality assurance review, radiation therapy compliance with COG protocols should be high. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 260
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
[21]   Quality assurance in preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer:: evaluation of a pre-trial dummy-run [J].
Widder, J ;
Sedlmayer, F ;
Stanek, C ;
Pötter, R .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 56 (03) :341-347