Ovulation induction with urinary FSH or recombinant FSH in polycystic ovary syndrome patients: a prospective randomized analysis of cost-effectiveness

被引:25
作者
Gerli, S [1 ]
Casini, ML
Unfer, V
Costabile, L
Mignosa, M
Di Renzo, GC
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Ctr Reprod & Perinatal Med, Dept Gynecol Obstet & Pediat Sci, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Human Physiol & Pharmacol Vittorio Erspamer, Rome, Italy
[3] AGUNCO, Obstet & Gynaecol Ctr, Rome, Italy
关键词
cost-effectiveness; intrauterine insemination; ovarian stimulation; PCOS; recombinant FSH; urinary FSH;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61632-X
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the clinical results and the cost-effectiveness of urinary FSH (uFSH) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) in ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. One-hundred and seventy PCOS infertile patients undergoing IUI were enrolled, and protocols of ovarian stimulation with uFSH or rFSH were randomly assigned. The total number of cycles performed was 379 (182 and 197, respectively). The main outcome measures were the number of mature follicles, the days of stimulation, the number of ampoules and IU used per cycle, the biochemical/clinical pregnancy rates, the number of multiple pregnancies and the cost-effectiveness. No statistically significant differences were found in the follicular development, length of stimulation, pregnancy rates, delivery rates and multiple pregnancies between the two groups. In the uFSH group, the cost per cycle remained significantly lower (218.51 +/- 88.69 Euro versus 312.22 +/- 118.12 Euro; P < 0.0001), even though a significantly higher number of IU of gonadotrophins were used (809.3 +/- 271.9 versus 589.1 +/- 244.7; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness (i.e. within a group, the total cost of all cycles divided by no. of clinical pregnancies) was 1729.08 in the uFSH group and 3075.37 in the rFSH group. In conclusion, uFSH and rFSH demonstrated the same effectiveness in ovarian stimulation in IUI cycles in PCOS patients. The urinary preparation is more cost-effective due to the difference of its cost per IU.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 499
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   Luteinzing hormone activity in menotropins optimizes folliculogenesis and treatment in controlled ovarian stimulation [J].
Filicori, M ;
Cognigni, GE ;
Taraborrelli, S ;
Spettoli, D ;
Ciampaglia, W ;
de Fatis, CT ;
Pocognoli, P ;
Cantelli, B ;
Boschi, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2001, 86 (01) :337-343
[12]  
Gerli S., 1999, Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, V26, P93
[13]   Generic human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in place of more costly follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) for routine ovulation induction [J].
Gleicher, N ;
Karande, V .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2000, 17 (09) :489-495
[14]   A randomized prospective assessor-blind evaluation of luteinizing hormone dosage and in vitro fertilization outcome [J].
Gordon, UD ;
Harrison, RF ;
Fawzy, M ;
Hennelly, B ;
Gordon, AC .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (02) :324-331
[15]   Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Goverde, AJ ;
McDonnell, J ;
Vermeiden, JPW ;
Schats, R ;
Rutten, FFH ;
Schoemaker, J .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9197) :13-18
[16]   Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility [J].
Guzick, DS ;
Sullivan, MW ;
Adamson, GD ;
Cedars, MI ;
Falk, RJ ;
Peterson, EP ;
Steinkampf, MP .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 70 (02) :207-213
[17]   Adverse effects of luteinizing hormone on fertility: fact or fantasy [J].
Homburg, R .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (04) :555-563
[18]  
Homburg Roy, 2003, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, V1, P109
[19]   A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing 150 IU recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon®) and 225 IU highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone (Metrodin-HP®) in a fixed-dose regimen in women undergoing ovarian stimulation [J].
Hoomans, EHM ;
Andersen, AN ;
Loft, A ;
Leerentveld, RA ;
van Kamp, AA ;
Zech, H .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (10) :2442-2447
[20]   The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis [J].
Hughes, EG .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (09) :1865-1872