Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists reduce the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by fructose in rats

被引:52
作者
Baker, RM
Shah, MJ
Sclafani, A
Bodnar, RJ
机构
[1] CUNY Queens Coll, Dept Psychol, Neuropsychol Doctoral Subprogram, Flushing, NY 11367 USA
[2] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Dept Psychol, Expt Doctoral Subprogram, New York, NY USA
关键词
flavor-flavor learning; sweet taste; saccharin; SCH23390; raclopride;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00039-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The effects of dopamine (DA) D-1 and D-2 receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of fructose were examined. Food-restricted rats were trained over eight alternating one-bottle sessions to drink an 8% fructose solution containing one novel flavor (CS+) and a less preferred 0.2% saccharin solution containing a different flavor (CS-). Three groups of rats were treated daily with either vehicle (control group), SCH23390 (200 nmol/kg; D-1 group), or raclopride (200 nmol/kg; D-2 group) during training. Additional groups of vehicle-treated rats had their daily training intakes matched to that of the D-1 and D-2 groups. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests with the CS+ and CS - flavors presented in 0.2% saccharin solutions following doses of 0, 50, 200, 400, or 800 nmol/kg of either D-1 or D-2 antagonists. The D-1 and D-2 groups, unlike the control and yoked-control groups, failed to display a significant CS+ preference in the two-bottle tests following vehicle treatment. In addition, treatment with SCH23390 prior to the two-bottle tests blocked the expression of the CS+ preference in the control groups. Pretest raclopride treatment attenuated the CS+ preference at some dose levels. Raclopride also attenuated the preference for fructose in rats given two-bottle training with the CS+/fructose (CS+/F) and CS-/saccharin (CS-/S) solutions. These findings indicate that D-1 and D-2 antagonists block flavor-preference conditioning by sweet taste and that D-1, and to a lesser extent D-2, receptor antagonists attenuate the expression of a previously acquired preference. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   HOW FOOD PREFERENCES ARE LEARNED - LABORATORY-ANIMAL MODELS [J].
SCLAFANI, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 1995, 54 (02) :419-427
[22]   LEARNED PREFERENCES FOR REAL-FED AND SHAM-FED POLYCOSE IN RATS - INTERACTION OF TASTE, POSTINGESTIVE REINFORCEMENT, AND SATIETY [J].
SCLAFANI, A ;
NISSENBAUM, JW ;
ACKROFF, K .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 56 (02) :331-337
[23]   INTRAGASTRIC GLUCOSE BUT NOT FRUCTOSE CONDITIONS ROBUST FLAVOR PREFERENCES IN RATS [J].
SCLAFANI, A ;
CARDIERI, C ;
TUCKER, K ;
BLUSK, D ;
ACKROFF, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 265 (02) :R320-R325
[24]  
Smith G.P., 1995, PROGR PSYCHOBIOLOGY, V16, P83
[25]  
Warwick ZS, 1996, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V60, P711, DOI 10.1016/0031-9384(96)00087-X
[26]   SHAM FEEDING AS A PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING THE INFLUENCE OF DIET PALATABILITY ON FOOD-INTAKE [J].
WEINGARTEN, HP ;
WATSON, SD .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1982, 28 (03) :401-407
[27]   THE EFFECTS OF PIMOZIDE ON THE CONSUMPTION OF A PALATABLE SACCHARIN-GLUCOSE SOLUTION IN THE RAT [J].
XENAKIS, S ;
SCLAFANI, A .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1981, 15 (03) :435-442
[28]   Role of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the acquisition and expression of flavor-preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats [J].
Yu, WZ ;
Silva, RM ;
Sclafani, A ;
Delamater, AR ;
Bodnar, RJ .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 67 (03) :537-544
[29]   Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: Effects of naltrexone [J].
Yu, WZ ;
Sclafani, A ;
Delamater, AR ;
Bodnar, RJ .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 64 (03) :573-584
[30]   Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists [J].
Yu, WZ ;
Silva, RM ;
Sclafani, A ;
Delamater, AR ;
Bodnar, RJ .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 65 (04) :635-647