Electromagnetic wave compression and radio frequency homogeneity in NMR solenoidal coils: Computational approach

被引:39
作者
Engelke, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Bruker Biospin GmbH, D-76287 Rehinstetten, Germany
来源
CONCEPTS IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE | 2002年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
electromagnetic fields; helical waveguides; Maxwell equations; wave compression; solenoidal coils; NMR; balanced circuits; radio frequency held distribution;
D O I
10.1002/cmr.10029
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The homogeneity of the radio frequency (RF) magnetic field in the region of the NMR sample is prerequisite for good performance in many NMR experiments. When calculating such fields, the quasistationary approximation is valid for wavelengths that are large compared to the physical dimensions of the NMR coil, but it no longer applies for the geometrical dimensions of NMR coils at high frequencies. The present study investigates electromagnetic fields in solenoidal coils. Considering the electromagnetic field derivable from first principles allows us to systematically study the effects that originate from the finiteness of the wavelength compared to the physical size of solenoidal coils employed in NMR probes. There are three major effects that occur: the wavelength in the coil is generally different from the wavelength in free space, even for an absent sample; the dielectric properties of the NMR sample have an additional influence on the electromagnetic field distribution inside the coil; and the circuit surrounding the coil leads to a wave reflection that affects the RF magnetic field distribution originating from the superposition of forward and backward traveling waves. The results allow the derivation of principal conclusions for the characterization of NMR solenoidal coils. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 155
页数:27
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Bossavit A., 1998, COMPUTATIONAL ELECTR
[2]  
BREY WW, 2000, 41 EXP NUCL RES C PA
[3]   EFFECT OF RF INHOMOGENEITY UPON QUANTITATIVE SOLID-STATE NMR MEASUREMENTS [J].
CAMPBELL, GC ;
GALYA, LG ;
BEELER, AJ ;
ENGLISH, AD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES A, 1995, 112 (02) :225-228
[4]   CURRENTS AND FIELDS OF THIN CONDUCTORS IN RF-SADDLE COILS [J].
CARLSON, JW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1986, 3 (05) :778-790
[5]   Sample restriction using magnetic field gradients in high-resolution solid-state NMR [J].
Charmont, P ;
Lesage, A ;
Steuernagel, S ;
Engelke, F ;
Emsley, L .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2000, 145 (02) :334-339
[6]   HELICAL RESONATORS FOR SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY [J].
COLLINGWOOD, JC ;
WHITE, JW .
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1967, 44 (07) :509-+
[7]   Sample-induced RF perturbations in high-field, high-resolution NMR spectroscopy [J].
Crozier, S ;
Brereton, IM ;
Zelaya, FO ;
Roffmann, WU ;
Doddrell, DM .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1997, 126 (01) :39-47
[8]   COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESONATING VOLUME FOR ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE AT METER WAVELENGTHS [J].
DECORPS, M ;
FRIC, C .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS E-SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1969, 2 (12) :1036-&
[9]  
Floquet G., 1883, ANN SCI ECOLE NORM S, V12, P47, DOI [DOI 10.24033/ASENS.220, 10.24033/asens.220/, 10.24033/asens.220]
[10]   RADIOFREQUENCY LOSSES IN NMR EXPERIMENTS ON ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTING SAMPLES [J].
GADIAN, DG ;
ROBINSON, FNH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1979, 34 (02) :449-455