Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur

被引:21
作者
Mole, PA [1 ]
McMurdo, MET [1 ]
Paterson, CR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Med, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659136
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
An evaluation of the Osteoscan peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometer (pDXA) was carried out to compare its performance with those of a single photon absorptiometer (SPA) (Molsgaard Medical ND1100A) and a dual energy X-rep absorptiometer (DXA) (Lunar DPX alpha) of the spine or femur. In 57 patients, correlation between bone mineral content (BMC) of the forearm at the ultradistal (UD) site by pDXA and by SPA was high (r = 0.94). Comparisons were also made with spine and femur bone mineral density (BMD) DXA measurements. The correlation of z-scores of UD BMD with z-scores for lumbar spine L2-L4 was r = 0.63 (n = 73 patients); and with z-scores for neck of femur was r = 0.72 (n = 33). With the Osteoscan the measurement error coefficient of variation in vivo was 2.6% for BMC, 1.8% for BMD at the ultradistal site; 2.1% for BMC and 1.9% for BMD at the mid-distal site. Repeat measurements were made of the European forearm phantom; precision for SPA was slightly better than either pDXA or Lunar DXA. The Osteoscan has the potential for a rapid throughput of patients and is not affected by calcification and degenerative changes that can corrupt DXA measurements on the anteroposterior spine in older women.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
DEQUEKER J, 1993, ADV BIOMED ENG, P132
[2]  
JOHNSTON CC, 1995, AM J MED, V98, pA2
[3]   SINGLE X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE FOREARM - PRECISION, CORRELATION, AND REFERENCE DATA [J].
KELLY, TL ;
CRANE, G ;
BARAN, DT .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 54 (03) :212-218
[4]  
LARCOS G, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P2101
[5]  
LEBOFF MS, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, P841
[6]   COMPARISON OF SINGLE-PHOTON AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE RADIUS [J].
NELSON, D ;
FEINGOLD, M ;
MASCHA, E ;
KLEEREKOPER, M .
BONE AND MINERAL, 1992, 18 (01) :77-83
[7]   COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY OF THE FOREARM USING SINGLE PHOTON AND DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
NIEVES, JW ;
COSMAN, F ;
MARS, C ;
LINDSAY, R .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 51 (05) :352-355
[8]   BONE-DENSITY IN OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA MAY WELL BE NORMAL [J].
PATERSON, CR ;
MOLE, PA .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 70 (820) :104-107
[9]   EUROPEAN SEMI-ANTHROPOMORPHIC SPINE PHANTOM FOR THE CALIBRATION OF BONE DENSITOMETERS - ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION, STABILITY AND ACCURACY - THE EUROPEAN QUANTITATION OF OSTEOPOROSIS STUDY-GROUP [J].
PEARSON, J ;
DEQUEKER, J ;
HENLEY, M ;
BRIGHT, J ;
REEVE, J ;
KALENDER, W ;
LAVALJEANTET, AM ;
RUEGSEGGER, P ;
FELSENBERG, D ;
ADAMS, J ;
BIRKENHAGER, JC ;
BRAILLON, P ;
CURIEL, MD ;
FISCHER, M ;
GALAN, F ;
GEUSENS, P ;
HYLDSTRUP, L ;
JAEGER, P ;
JONSON, R ;
KALEFEZRAS, J ;
KOTZKI, P ;
KROGER, H ;
VANLINGEN, A ;
NILSSON, S ;
OSTEAUX, M ;
CANO, RP ;
REID, DM ;
REINERS, C ;
RIBOT, C ;
SCHNEIDER, P ;
SLOSMAN, DO ;
WITTENBERG, G .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (03) :174-184
[10]   Reference ranges of bone mineral density for women in southern England: The impact of local data on the diagnosis of osteoporosis [J].
Petley, GW ;
Cotton, AM ;
Murrills, AJ ;
Taylor, PA ;
Cooper, C ;
Cawley, MID ;
Wilkin, TJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (823) :655-660