Attitudes Toward Information About Genetic Risk for Cognitive Impairment After Cancer Chemotherapy: Breast Cancer Survivors Compared With Healthy Controls

被引:9
作者
Andrykowski, Michael A. [1 ]
Burris, Jessica L.
Walsh, Erin
Small, Brent J.
Jacobsen, Paul B.
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Behav Sci, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
OVARIAN-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC SIGNATURE; PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES; DECISIONAL CONFLICT; GENOMIC MEDICINE; VALIDATION; WOMEN; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8267
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The trend toward personalized medicine will involve cancer treatment increasingly being tailored to the genetic characteristics of individuals. However, the availability of genetic information does not imply this information is desired or would impact treatment decision making. Methods One hundred sixty breast cancer survivors (BC group) and 205 healthy controls (HC group) were randomly assigned to respond to two different clinical scenarios varying in genetic-related risk of cognitive impairment (CI; little v very likely) and severity of CI (little v moderate problem) after chemotherapy. Ratings of the importance of being told this genetic information (information importance) and the likelihood this information would affect their decision to receive chemotherapy (information impact) were obtained. Results Results indicated the importance ascribed to genetic information was greatest when CI likelihood and severity were both high or low (P < .05). Information impact ratings were not sensitive to differences in CI likelihood or severity; the BC group was less likely to indicate genetic information would affect their decision to receive chemotherapy than the HC group (P < .001). Conclusion Results suggest lessened enthusiasm for genetic information that maintains or increases uncertainty about a specific course of action and highlight the importance of including clinically relevant groups in treatment decision-making research that employs hypothetical scenarios. Although women generally believe it is important to receive genetic information, they might benefit from assistance (eg, decision aid) in the difficult task of integrating information about survival and risk for adverse late effects from cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 28:3442-3447. (C) 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3442 / 3447
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The relationship of APOE genotype to neuropsychological performance in long-term cancer survivors treated with standard dose chemotherapy [J].
Ahles, TA ;
Saykin, AJ ;
Noll, WW ;
Furstenberg, CT ;
Guerin, S ;
Cole, B ;
Mott, LA .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (06) :612-619
[2]   Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes [J].
Ahles, Tim A. ;
Saykin, Andrew J. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2007, 7 (03) :192-201
[3]   BRCA1 and BRCA2:: From molecular genetics to clinical medicine [J].
Blackwood, MA ;
Weber, BL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (05) :1969-1977
[4]  
Bowen DJ, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P326
[5]   When genomic and standard test results diverge: implications for breast cancer patients' preference for chemotherapy [J].
Brewer, Noel T. ;
Edwards, Alrick S. ;
O'Neill, Suzanne C. ;
Tzeng, Janice P. ;
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Rimer, Barbara K. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 117 (01) :25-29
[6]   Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Loi, Sherene ;
van't Veer, Laura ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Delorenzi, Mauro ;
Glas, Annuska M. ;
d'Assignies, Mahasti Saghatchian ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Lidereau, Rosette ;
Ellis, Paul ;
Harris, Adrian ;
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Therasse, Patrick ;
Floore, Arno ;
Amakrane, Mohamed ;
Piette, Fanny ;
Rutgers, Emiel ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Piccart, Martine J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1183-1192
[7]   Psychosocial factors and patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer [J].
Duric, Vlatka M. ;
Butow, Phyllis N. ;
Sharpe, Louise ;
Boyle, Frances ;
Beith, Jane ;
Wilcken, Nicholas R. C. ;
Heritier, Stephane ;
Coates, Alan S. ;
Simes, R. John ;
Stockler, Martin R. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (01) :48-59
[8]  
Fasouliotis S J, 2000, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V55, P373, DOI 10.1097/00006254-200006000-00023
[9]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[10]   Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer [J].
Foekens, JA ;
Atkins, D ;
Zhang, Y ;
Sweep, FCGJ ;
Harbeck, N ;
Paradiso, A ;
Cufer, T ;
Sieuwerts, AM ;
Talantov, D ;
Span, PN ;
Tjan-Heijnen, VCG ;
Zito, AF ;
Specht, K ;
Hoefler, H ;
Golouh, R ;
Schittulli, F ;
Schmitt, M ;
Beex, LVAM ;
Klijn, IGM ;
Wang, YX .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (11) :1665-1671