Use of novel interactive input devices for segmentation of articular cartilage from magnetic resonance images

被引:36
作者
McWalter, EJ
Wirth, W
Siebert, M
von Eisenhart-Rothe, RMO
Hudelmaier, M
Wilson, DR
Eckstein, F
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Mech Engn, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Chondrometr Med Data Proc GmbH, Munich, Germany
[3] GSF, Natl Res Ctr, Medis Inst, Oberschleissheim, Germany
[4] Univ Frankfurt, Dept Orthopaed, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
[5] LMU Munchen, Inst Anat, Musculoskeletal Res Grp, Munich, Germany
[6] Paracelsus Private Med Univ, Inst Anat, Salzburg, Austria
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Div Orthopaed Engn Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[8] Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
articular cartilage; cartilage segmentation; input devices; magnetic resonance imaging; osteoarthritis;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2004.09.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To study the effect of new interactive computer input devices on cartilage segmentation in terms of time, consistency between input devices, and precision in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI). Design: We compared two new input devices, an interactive digitizing tablet and an interactive touch-sensitive screen, to a traditional mouse. Medial tibial and patellar cartilage of six healthy and six osteoarthritic knees were segmented using each input device. Cartilage volume, surface area and mean thickness were assessed using a validated algorithm and used to determine consistency and precision. Segmentation time was also measured. Results: Segmenting with an interactive touch-sensitive screen reduced segmentation time by 15% when compared to the traditional mouse but we found no significant difference in segmentation time between the interactive digitizing tablet and the traditional mouse. We found no difference in consistency or precision of cartilage volume, mean thickness or surface area between the three input devices tested. Conclusions: We conclude that measurements of cartilage made using articular cartilage segmentation from MR images are independent of the input device chosen for user interaction. (C) 2004 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 53
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
Joint structure modification in osteoarthritis: Development of SMOAD drugs [J].
Beary J.F., III .
Current Rheumatology Reports, 2001, 3 (6) :506-512
[2]
Burgkart R, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P2072, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2072::AID-ART357>3.0.CO
[3]
2-3
[4]
MRI techniques in early stages of cartilage disease [J].
Burstein, D ;
Bashir, A ;
Gray, ML .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (10) :622-638
[5]
New MRI techniques for imaging cartilage [J].
Burstein, D ;
Gray, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :70-77
[6]
Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Forbes, A ;
Asbeutah, A ;
Morris, K ;
Stuckey, S .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2000, 18 (04) :580-584
[7]
Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Wuka, AE ;
Wang, Y ;
Stuckey, SL .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2004, 50 (01) :94-97
[8]
Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Forbes, A ;
Morris, K ;
Darling, S ;
Bailey, M ;
Stuckey, S .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1999, 7 (03) :265-271
[9]
Cicuttini FM, 2002, J RHEUMATOL, V29, P2615
[10]
Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements [J].
Cohen, ZA ;
McCarthy, DM ;
Kwak, SD ;
Legrand, P ;
Fogarasi, F ;
Ciaccio, EJ ;
Ateshian, GA .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1999, 7 (01) :95-109