Utility of a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire to assess renal artery translesional systolic pressure gradients

被引:40
作者
Colyer, WR [1 ]
Cooper, CJ [1 ]
Burket, MW [1 ]
Thomas, WJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Ohio, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
关键词
vascular diseases; hemodynamics; renal artery stenosis; stent;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.10508
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Renal ischemia due to renal artery stenosis (RAS) is an important cause of secondary hypertension and renal insufficiency. Several methods are available to diagnose RAS; however, the identification of clinically significant lesions remains problematic. We measured the translesional systolic pressure gradient (TSPG) with a 4 Fr catheter and a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire and compared these data to angiographic findings. The TSPG obtained by pressure-sensing guidewire correlated more strongly with angiographic minimal lumen diameter (r(2) = 0.801) than those obtained by 4 Fr catheter (r(2) = 0.360). The relationship of TSPG with percent stenosis was not strong, regardless of the method used (r(2) = 0.228 with pressure-sensing guidewire, 0.358 with 4 Fr catheter). Using a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire is effective for assessing TSPG and provides a more reliable indication of stenosis significance than use of a 4 Fr catheter. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 377
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Assessment of renal artery stenosis: Comparison of captopril renography and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography [J].
Bongers, V ;
Bakker, J ;
Beutler, JJ ;
Beek, FJA ;
De Klerk, JMH .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (05) :346-352
[4]   Renal artery angioplasty and stent placement: Predictors of a favorable outcome [J].
Burket, MW ;
Cooper, CJ ;
Kennedy, DJ ;
Brewster, PS ;
Ansel, GM ;
Moore, JA ;
Venkatesan, J ;
Henrich, WL .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 139 (01) :64-71
[5]   RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS AND HYPERTENSION [J].
DERKX, FHM ;
SCHALEKAMP, MADH .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8917) :237-239
[6]   STENTING OF A RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS ACHIEVES BETTER RELIEF OF THE OBSTRUCTIVE LESION THAN BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY [J].
DORROS, G ;
PRINCE, C ;
MATHIAK, L .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 29 (03) :191-198
[7]   Four-year follow-up of Palmaz-Schatz stent revascularization as treatment for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis [J].
Dorros, G ;
Jaff, M ;
Mathiak, L ;
Dorros, II ;
Lowe, A ;
Murphy, K ;
He, T .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (07) :642-647
[8]   High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography [J].
Fain, SB ;
King, BF ;
Breen, JF ;
Kruger, DG ;
Riederer, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (02) :481-490
[9]   Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity:: Comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter [J].
Gross, CM ;
Krämer, J ;
Weingärtner, O ;
Uhlich, F ;
Luft, FC ;
Waigand, J ;
Dietz, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :751-756
[10]   Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment [J].
Hanekamp, CEE ;
Koolen, JJ ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Michels, HR ;
Bonnier, HJRM .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (08) :1015-1021