The effects of mild and severe traumatic brain injury on speed of information processing as measured by the computerized tests of information processing (CTIP)

被引:37
作者
Tombaugh, Tom N.
Rees, Laura
Stormer, Peter
Harrison, Allyson G.
Smith, Andra
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Rehabil Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[4] Hawkes Bay Dist Hlth Board, Rehabil Unit, Hastings, New Zealand
[5] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
computerized tests of information processing; CTIP; TBI; CLOSED-HEAD-INJURY; VISUAL REACTION-TIME; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; ATTENTION DEFICITS; DIVIDED ATTENTION; CONCUSSION; MEMORY; PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY; CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.013
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In spite of the fact that reaction time (RT) measures are sensitive to the effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI), few RT procedures have been developed for use in standard clinical evaluations. The computerized test of information processing (CTIP) [Tombaugh, T.N., & Rees, L. (2000). Manual for the computerized tests of information processing (CTIP). Ottawa, Ont.: Carleton University] was designed to measure the degree to which TBI decreases the speed at which information is processed. The CTIP consists of three computerized programs that progressively increase the amount of information that is processed. Results of the current study demonstrated that RT increased as the difficulty of the CTIP tests increased (known as the complexity effect), and as severity of injury increased (from mild to severe TBI). The current study also demonstrated the importance of selecting a non-biased measure of variability. Overall, findings suggest that the CTIP is an easy to administer and sensitive measure of information processing speed. (c) 2006 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 36
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]   Slow information processing after very severe closed head injury: impaired access to declarative knowledge and intact application and acquisition of procedural knowledge [J].
Timmerman, ME ;
Brouwer, WH .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1999, 37 (04) :467-478
[42]  
Tombaugh T.N., 2000, Manual for the Computerized Tests of Information Processing (CTIP)
[43]   The test of memory malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals [J].
Tombaugh, TN .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1997, 9 (03) :260-268
[44]  
Van Zomeran A., 1987, NEUROBEHAVIORAL RECO, P398
[45]  
Van Zomeren A.H., 1981, Reaction Time and Attention after Closed Head Injury
[46]  
van Zomeren A.H., 1994, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
[47]   LONG-TERM RECOVERY OF VISUAL REACTION-TIME AFTER CLOSED HEAD-INJURY [J].
VANZOMEREN, AH ;
DEELMAN, BG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1978, 41 (05) :452-457
[48]   Central executive aspects of attention in subacute severe and very severe closed head injury patients: Planning, inhibition, flexibility, and divided attention [J].
Veltman, JC ;
Brouwer, WH ;
vanZomeren, AH ;
vanWolffelaar, PC .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 10 (03) :357-367
[49]  
Wechsler D., 2008, WECHSLER ADULT INTEL
[50]   Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests [J].
Willison, J ;
Tombaugh, TN .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 21 (01) :41-52