Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations

被引:311
作者
Leung, Cynthia C. [1 ]
Palomo, Leena [1 ]
Griffith, Richard [1 ]
Hans, Mark G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
MANDIBULAR INCISORS; GEOMETRIC ACCURACY; TOOTH MOVEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; CT; VOLUME; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis of naturally occurring fenestrations and bony dehiscences. In addition, we evaluated the accuracy and reliability of CBCT for measuring alveolar bone margins. Methods: Thirteen dry human skulls with 334 teeth were scanned with CBCT technology. Measurements were made on each tooth in the volume-rendering mode from the cusp or incisal tip to the cementoenamel junction and from the cusp or incisal tip to the bone margin along the long axis of the tooth. The accuracy of the CBCT measurements was determined by comparing the means, mean differences, absolute mean differences, and Pearson correlation coefficients with those of direct measurements. Accuracy for detection of defects was determined by using sensitivity and specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Results: The CBCT measurements showed mean deviations of 0.1 +/- 0.5 mm for measurements to the cementoenamel junction and 0.2 +/- 1.0 mm to the bone margin. The absolute values of the mean differences were 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm for the cementoenamel junction and 0.6 +/- 0.8 mm for the bone margin. The sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for fenestrations were both about 0.80, whereas the specificity for dehiscences was higher (0.95) and the sensitivity lower (0.40). The negative predictive values were high (>= 0.95), and the positive predictive values were low (dehiscence, 0.50; fenestration, 0.25). The reliability of all measurements was high (r >= 194). Conclusions: By using a voxel size of 0.38 mm at 2 mA, CBCT alveolar bone height can be measured to an accuracy of about 0.6 mm, and root fenestrations can be identified with greater accuracy than dehiscences. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:S109-19)
引用
收藏
页码:S109 / S119
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
INCIDENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ALVEOLAR BONY DEHISCENCE AND FENESTRATION IN DRY HUMAN EGYPTIAN JAWS [J].
ABDELMALEK, RG ;
BISSADA, NF .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1973, 44 (09) :586-588
[2]
[Anonymous], 2013, DESIGNING CLIN RES
[3]
Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay™):: system configuration and physical properties [J].
Araki, K ;
Maki, K ;
Seki, K ;
Sakamaki, K ;
Harata, Y ;
Sakaino, R ;
Okano, T ;
Seo, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (01) :51-59
[4]
THE EFFECT OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT ON PERIODONTAL BONE SUPPORT IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED LOSS OF MARGINAL PERIODONTIUM [J].
ARTUN, J ;
URBYE, KS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 93 (02) :143-148
[5]
Baba Rika, 2001, Frontiers of Medical and Biological Engineering, V11, P177, DOI 10.1163/15685570152772450
[6]
Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine [J].
Ballrick, John W. ;
Palomo, J. Martin ;
Ruch, Edward ;
Amberman, B. Douglas ;
Hans, Mark G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 134 (04) :573-582
[7]
Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements [J].
Baumgaertel, Sebastian ;
Palomo, J. Martin ;
Palomo, Leena ;
Hans, Mark G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (01) :19-25
[8]
CARRANZA FA, 2002, TOOTH SUPPORTING STR
[9]
ALVEOLAR DEFECTS IN HUMAN SKULLS [J].
DAVIES, RM ;
DOWNER, MC ;
HULL, PS ;
LENNON, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1974, 1 (02) :107-111
[10]
ALVEOLAR BONE FENESTRATIONS AND DEHISCENCES IN DRY BEDOUIN JAWS [J].
EDEL, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1981, 8 (06) :491-499