Economics Analysis of Mitigation Strategies for FMD Introduction in Highly Concentrated Animal Feeding Regions

被引:24
作者
Elbakidze, Levan [1 ]
Highfield, Linda [2 ]
Ward, Michael [3 ]
McCarl, Bruce A. [2 ]
Norby, Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2009年 / 31卷 / 04期
关键词
MOUTH-DISEASE; GREAT-BRITAIN; FOOT; IMPACT; EPIDEMIC; SPREAD; CONSUMER; DEMAND; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01477.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
120302 [林业经济管理];
摘要
In this article, we present a linked epidemiologic-economic modeling framework that is used to investigate several foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) mitigation strategies under the context of an FMD outbreak in a concentrated cattle-feeding region in the United States. We extend the literature by investigating the economic effectiveness of some previously unaddressed strategies. These include early detection, enhanced vaccine availability, and enhanced surveillance under various combinations of slaughter, surveillance, and vaccination. We also consider disease introduction points at a large feedlot, a backgrounder feedlot, a large grazing herd, and a backyard herd all in the Texas High Plains. To examine the economic implications of these strategies, we use a two-component stochastic framework. The first component is the epidemiologic model that simulates the spread of FMD as affected by control policies and introduction scenarios. The second component is an economic module, which calculates cattle industry losses and costs of disease control strategy implementation, and processes the results in a stochastic framework. The results show that early detection of the disease is the most effective mechanism for minimizing the costs of outbreak. Under some circumstances, enhanced surveillance also proved an effective strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 950
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Benefit-cost analysis of vaccination and preemptive slaughter as a means of eradicating foot-and-mouth disease [J].
Bates, TW ;
Carpenter, TE ;
Thurmond, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2003, 64 (07) :805-812
[2]
Results of epidemic simulation modeling to evaluate strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease [J].
Bates, TW ;
Thurmond, MC ;
Carpenter, TE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2003, 64 (02) :205-210
[3]
A DYNAMIC-MODEL FOR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES OF FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE CONTROL STRATEGIES [J].
BERENTSEN, PBM ;
DIJKHUIZEN, AA ;
OSKAM, AJ .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1992, 12 (3-4) :229-243
[4]
The impact of BSE on the demand for beef and other meats in Great Britain [J].
Burton, M ;
Young, T .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1996, 28 (06) :687-693
[5]
*DEFRA, 2007, FOOT MOUTH DIS VET R
[6]
RISK ATTITUDE AND DECISION-MAKING IN CONTAGIOUS-DISEASE CONTROL [J].
DIJKHUIZEN, AA ;
HARDAKER, JB ;
HUIRNE, RBM .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1994, 18 (03) :203-212
[7]
Ekboir J.M., 1999, POTENTIAL IMPACT FOO
[8]
Elbakidze L., 2006, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V38, P327
[9]
Elbakidze L, 2007, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V32, P169
[10]
The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of spread and impact of interventions [J].
Ferguson, NM ;
Donnelly, CA ;
Anderson, RM .
SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5519) :1155-1160