Classroom and Grade Level Differences in the Stability of Teacher Expectations and Perceived Differential Teacher Treatment

被引:12
作者
Kuklinski M. [1 ]
Weinstein R. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of California, Berkeley
关键词
children's perceptions; classroom environment stability; developmental differences; differential teacher treatment; teacher expectations; urban elementary schools;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009904718353
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using two independent samples of urban elementary school children from Grades 1, 3, and 5, this study explored the long-term stability of classroom learning environments that differ in the extent of differential teacher treatment favoring high achievers over low achievers, as reported by students. Classroom differences ('high' versus 'low') in perceived differential treatment were highly stable from fall to spring in Grades 3 and 5, but not in Grade 1. Stability in (a) individual children's reports of differential treatment, and (b) teacher expectations for children's year-end reading achievement was accentuated in classrooms where differential treatment was pronounced early in the year, particularly in the higher elementary grades. Findings suggest that there would be heightened risk for problematic teacher expectancy effects and other maladaptive learning outcomes in these classrooms, because stable or rigid performance expectations are coupled with classroom instructional patterns that consistently convey these expectations to children. In contrast, risk is likely to be reduced in classrooms where high and low achievers are treated more equitably in the eyes of children, because teachers' expectations for children are more flexible, and children take longer to discern differences in treatment. The overall consistency of findings in two samples supports the generalizability of the conclusions reached. © 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 34
页数:33
相关论文
共 75 条
[31]  
Goh S.C., Fraser B.J., Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore, Learning Environments Research, 1, pp. 199-229, (1998)
[32]  
Goldenberg C., The limits of expectations: A case for knowledge about teacher expectancy effects, American Educational Research Journal, 29, pp. 517-544, (1992)
[33]  
Goldman R.K., Botkin M.J., Tokunaga H., Kuklinski M., Teacher consultation: Impact on teachers' effectiveness and students' cognitive competence and achievement, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, pp. 374-384, (1997)
[34]  
Good T.L., Weinstein R.S., Teacher expectations: A framework for exploring classrooms, Improving teaching (1986 Yearbook), pp. 63-85, (1986)
[35]  
Gottfredson D.C., Marciniak E.M., Birsdseye A.T., Gottfredson G.D., Increasing teacher expectations for student achievement, Journal of Educational Research, 88, pp. 156-163, (1995)
[36]  
Gustavsson J.P., Weinryb R.M., Gorannson S., Pederson N.L., Asberg M., Stability and predictive ability of personality traits across nine years, Personality and Individual Differences, 22, pp. 783-791, (1997)
[37]  
Haertel G.D., Walberg H.J., Assessing socio-psychological classroom environments in program evaluation, Evaluating program environments, pp. 45-61, (1988)
[38]  
Harris M.J., Rosenthal R., Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses, Psychological Bulletin, 97, pp. 363-386, (1985)
[39]  
Howell D.C., Statistical methods for psychology, (1992)
[40]  
The schools partnership project: A successful model towards improving school performance, (1992)