Classroom and Grade Level Differences in the Stability of Teacher Expectations and Perceived Differential Teacher Treatment

被引:12
作者
Kuklinski M. [1 ]
Weinstein R. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of California, Berkeley
关键词
children's perceptions; classroom environment stability; developmental differences; differential teacher treatment; teacher expectations; urban elementary schools;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009904718353
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using two independent samples of urban elementary school children from Grades 1, 3, and 5, this study explored the long-term stability of classroom learning environments that differ in the extent of differential teacher treatment favoring high achievers over low achievers, as reported by students. Classroom differences ('high' versus 'low') in perceived differential treatment were highly stable from fall to spring in Grades 3 and 5, but not in Grade 1. Stability in (a) individual children's reports of differential treatment, and (b) teacher expectations for children's year-end reading achievement was accentuated in classrooms where differential treatment was pronounced early in the year, particularly in the higher elementary grades. Findings suggest that there would be heightened risk for problematic teacher expectancy effects and other maladaptive learning outcomes in these classrooms, because stable or rigid performance expectations are coupled with classroom instructional patterns that consistently convey these expectations to children. In contrast, risk is likely to be reduced in classrooms where high and low achievers are treated more equitably in the eyes of children, because teachers' expectations for children are more flexible, and children take longer to discern differences in treatment. The overall consistency of findings in two samples supports the generalizability of the conclusions reached. © 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 34
页数:33
相关论文
共 75 条
[61]  
Soule C.R., Predictors of children's susceptibility to teacher expectations, (1993)
[62]  
Sternberg R.J., Grigorenko E.L., Are cognitive styles still in style?, American Psychologist, 52, pp. 700-712, (1997)
[63]  
Stipek D., Daniels D.H., Declining perceptions of competence: A consequence of changes in the child or in the educational environment?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, pp. 352-356, (1988)
[64]  
Stipek D., Gralinski J.H., Children's beliefs about intelligence and school performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, pp. 397-407, (1996)
[65]  
Stipek D., Tannatt L.M., Children's judgments of their own and their peers' academic competence, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, pp. 75-84, (1984)
[66]  
Swann W.B., Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp. 1038-1051, (1987)
[67]  
Swann W.B., Ely R.J., A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, pp. 1287-1302, (1984)
[68]  
Waxman H.C., Investigating classroom and school learning environments: A review of research and recent developments in the field, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26, 2, pp. 1-4, (1991)
[69]  
Waxman H.C., Huang S.L., Classroom learning environments in urban elementary, middle, and high schools, Learning Environments Research, 1, pp. 95-113, (1998)
[70]  
Waxman H.C., Huang S.L., Padron Y.N., Motivation and learning environment differences between resilient and nonresilient Latino middle school students, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 2, pp. 137-155, (1997)