ALBUTEROL DELIVERY IN A MODEL OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION - COMPARISON OF METERED-DOSE INHALER AND NEBULIZER EFFICIENCY

被引:99
作者
DIOT, P
MORRA, L
SMALDONE, GC
机构
[1] SUNY STONY BROOK,UNIV MED CTR,DEPT MED,DIV PULM CRIT CARE,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
[2] UNITE EVALUAT CLIN,DEPT MALAD RESP,BRETONNEAU,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551401
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Using an in vitro model, we compared efficiencies of jet nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers (MDI) with actuator devices to deliver albuterol in various conditions of mechanical ventilation. Factors tested included influence of humidification, MDI actuator device (Aerovent(R) spacer or Marquest 172275 MDI adaptor), and synchronization of MDI to the respiratory cycle. With the nebulizer (AeroTech II(R)) filled with 2.5 mg albuterol sulfate in 3 mi water and run until dry, inhaled mass was 42 +/- 2.6% and mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) was 1.3 mu m on a nonhumidified circuit. With the MDI+ Aerovent(R), the inhaled mass percentage per 90 mu gm puff was 15.4 +/- 0.2% with humidification and 25.1 +/- 3.7% without humidification, actuations being synchronized with the beginning of inspiration and separated by a 1-min pause. Failure to synchronize actuations with inspiration or to pause 1 min resulted in significant reductions in inhaled mass (by 35 and 72%, respectively). The Marquest adaptor was less efficient, with an inhaled mass of 7.2 +/- 0.7% under optimal conditions. Metered-dose inhaler actuation during expiration resulted in relatively large particles (MMAD = 2.0 mu m). All other MDI actuations led to essentially biphasic distributions, with particles greater than 1 mu m following a distribution similar to the nebulizer and the overall MMAD estimated to be 0.22 mu m. The AeroTech II(R) delivered a cumulative 1,000 mu g of drug (2,500 x 0.40) over 40 min. To achieve that amount, the MDI connected to the Aerovent(R) and used in its most efficient sequence would require 45 timed puffs (90 mu g per puff, 25.1% mean inhaled mass) and take 45 min of an experienced therapist's time. We conclude that nebulizers and MDI/spacers can both be effective in delivering aerosolized medications, but drug delivery can be significantly reduced if proper technique in setting up and using both devices is not followed. Physicians and respiratory therapists should be formally trained in the principles of aerosol delivery with mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1394
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]  
McPeck M., 1993, RESP CARE, V38, P887
[12]   ROSE IS A ROSE IS A ROSE - AEROSOL THERAPY IN VENTILATED PATIENTS - NEBULIZERS VERSUS METERED-DOSE INHALERS - A CONTINUING CONTROVERSY [J].
NEWHOUSE, MT ;
FULLER, HD .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1993, 148 (06) :1444-1446
[13]   DELIVERY OF A NEBULIZED AEROSOL TO A LUNG MODEL DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION - EFFECT OF VENTILATOR SETTINGS AND NEBULIZER TYPE, POSITION, AND VOLUME OF FILL [J].
ODOHERTY, MJ ;
THOMAS, SHL ;
PAGE, CJ ;
TREACHER, DF ;
NUNAN, TO .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 146 (02) :383-388
[14]   AEROSOL DEPOSITION IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS - OPTIMIZING NEBULIZER DELIVERY [J].
ORIORDAN, TG ;
PALMER, LB ;
SMALDONE, GC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 149 (01) :214-219
[15]   NEBULIZER FUNCTION DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION [J].
ORIORDAN, TG ;
GRECO, MJ ;
PERRY, RJ ;
SMALDONE, GC .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 145 (05) :1117-1122
[16]   DRUG DELIVERY VIA AEROSOL SYSTEMS - CONCEPT OF AEROSOL INHALED [J].
SMALDONE, GC .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG, 1991, 4 (03) :229-235
[17]  
SWIFT DL, 1985, AEROSOLS MED PRINCIP, P53
[18]   PULMONARY DEPOSITION OF A NEBULIZED AEROSOL DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION [J].
THOMAS, SHL ;
ODOHERTY, MJ ;
FIDLER, HM ;
PAGE, CJ ;
TREACHER, DF ;
NUNAN, TO .
THORAX, 1993, 48 (02) :154-159
[19]   DELIVERY OF ULTRASONIC NEBULIZED AEROSOLS TO A LUNG MODEL DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION [J].
THOMAS, SHL ;
ODOHERTY, MJ ;
PAGE, CJ ;
TREACHER, DF ;
NUNAN, TO .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1993, 148 (04) :872-877