REPRODUCIBILITY OF PATIENT POSITIONING DURING ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY, AS ASSESSED BY AN INTEGRATED MEGAVOLTAGE IMAGING-SYSTEM

被引:40
作者
GILDERSLEVE, J
DEARNALEY, DP
EVANS, PM
SWINDELL, W
机构
[1] ROYAL MARSDEN HOSP, NHS TRUST, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY, SUTTON SM2 5PT, SURREY, ENGLAND
[2] ROYAL MARSDEN HOSP, NHS TRUST, JOINT DEPT PHYS, SUTTON SM2 5PT, SURREY, ENGLAND
[3] CANC RES INST, SUTTON SM2 5PT, SURREY, ENGLAND
关键词
RADIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT ACCURACY; RANDOM ERROR; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; MEGAVOLTAGE IMAGING;
D O I
10.1016/0167-8140(95)01536-P
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A portal imaging system has been used, in conjunction with a movie measurement technique to measure set-up errors for 15 patients treated with radiotherapy of the pelvis and for 12 patients treated with radiotherapy of the brain. The pelvic patients were treated without fixation devices and the brain patients were treated with individually-moulded plastic shells. As would be expected the brain treatments were found to be more accurate than the pelvic treatments. Results are presented in terms of five error types: random error from treatment to treatment, error between mean treatment position and simulation position, random simulation error, systematic simulator-to-treatment errors and total treatment error. For the brain patients the simulation-to-treatment error predominates and random treatment errors were small (95% less than or equal to 3 mm, 77% less than or equal to 1.5 mm). Vector components of the systematic simulation-to-treatment errors were 1-2 mm with maximal random simulation error of +/- 5 mm (2 S.D.). There is much interest in the number of verification films necessary to evaluate treatment accuracy. These results indicate that one check film performed at the first treatment is likely to be sufficient for set-up evaluation. For the pelvis the random treatment error is larger (95% less than or equal to 4.5 mm, 87% less than or equal to 3 mm). The systematic simulation-to-treatment error is up to 3 mm and the maximal random simulation error is +/- 6 mm (2 S.D.). Thus corrections made solely on the basis of a first day check film may not be sufficient for adequate set-up evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 160
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ANTONUK L E, 1991, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V18, P610
[2]  
BAILY NA, 1980, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V6, P935, DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90341-7
[3]   A VERIFICATION PROCEDURE TO IMPROVE PATIENT SET-UP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BEL, A ;
VANHERK, M ;
BARTELINK, H ;
LEBESQUE, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) :253-260
[4]   TRANSFER ERRORS OF PLANNING CT TO SIMULATOR - A POSSIBLE SOURCE OF SETUP INACCURACIES [J].
BEL, A ;
BARTELINK, H ;
VIJLBRIEF, RE ;
LEBESQUE, JV .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 31 (02) :176-180
[5]   AUTOMATIC VERIFICATION OF RADIATION-FIELD SHAPE USING DIGITAL PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BIJHOLD, J ;
GILHUIJS, KGA ;
VANHERK, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (04) :1007-1014
[6]   MAXIMIZING SETUP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES AS APPLIED TO A CONFORMAL BOOST TECHNIQUE FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
BIJHOLD, J ;
LEBESQUE, JV ;
HART, AAM ;
VIJLBRIEF, RE .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 24 (04) :261-271
[7]   3-DIMENSIONAL VERIFICATION OF PATIENT PLACEMENT DURING RADIOTHERAPY USING PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BIJHOLD, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (02) :347-356
[8]  
BOVA FJ, 1987, MED PHYS, V14, P707
[9]   WEEKLY LOCALIZATION FILMS AND DETECTION OF FIELD PLACEMENT ERRORS [J].
BYHARDT, RW ;
COX, JD ;
HORNBURG, A ;
LIERMANN, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1978, 4 (9-10) :881-887
[10]  
CHENG YA, 1988, PHYS MED BIOL S1, V33, P46