EVIDENCE THAT DYSLEXIA MAY REPRESENT THE LOWER TAIL OF A NORMAL-DISTRIBUTION OF READING-ABILITY

被引:485
作者
SHAYWITZ, SE
ESCOBAR, MD
SHAYWITZ, BA
FLETCHER, JM
MAKUCH, R
机构
[1] YALE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
[2] YALE UNIV,SCH MED,CTR CHILD STUDY,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
[3] YALE UNIV,SCH MED,DIV BIOSTAT,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
[4] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV,DEPT STAT,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[5] UNIV TEXAS,DEPT PEDIAT,HOUSTON,TX 77025
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199201163260301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Dyslexia is now widely believed to be a biologically based disorder that is distinct from other, less specific reading problems. According to this view, reading ability is considered to follow a bimodal distribution, with dyslexia as the lower mode. We hypothesized that, instead, reading ability follows a normal distribution, with dyslexia at the lower end of the continuum. Methods and Results. We used data from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study, a sample survey of 414 Connecticut children who entered kindergarten in 1983 and were followed as a longitudinal cohort. Dyslexia was defined in terms of a discrepancy score, which represents the difference between actual reading achievement and achievement predicted on the basis of measures of intelligence. Data were available from intelligence tests administered in grades 1, 3, and 5 and achievement tests administered yearly in grades 1 through 6. For each child there were 108 possible discrepancy scores ([3 x 3 years] x [2 x 6 years]) based on combinations of the ability scores (full-scale, verbal, and performance 10) in each of three years and two achievement scores (reading and mathematics) in each of six years. We demonstrated that each of the discrepancy scores followed a univariate normal distribution and that the interrelation of two different discrepancy scores followed a bivariate normal distribution. At most, only 9 of 108 discrepancy scores (8.3 percent) and 171 of 3402 pairs of discrepancy scores (5-0 percent) were significantly different (at the 5 percent level) from the expected scores - well within the expected values for data with univariate and bivariate normal distributions, respectively. We also examined the stability of dyslexia over time. The normal-distribution model predicted (and the data indicated) that only 7 of the 25 children (28 percent) classified as having dyslexia in grade 1 would also be classified as having dyslexia in grade 3. Conclusions. Reading difficulties, including dyslexia, occur as part of a continuum that also includes normal reading ability. Dyslexia is not an all-or-none phenomenon, but like hypertension, occurs in degrees. The variability inherent in the diagnosis of dyslexia can be both quantified and predicted with use of the normal-distribution model.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[2]  
BADIAN NA, 1988, PRESCHOOL PREVENTION, P78
[3]   QUANTIFYING A SEVERE DISCREPANCY - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS [J].
CONE, TE ;
WILSON, LR .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 1981, 4 (04) :359-371
[4]  
CRITCHLEY M, 1970, DYSLEXIC CHILD
[5]  
de Hirsch K., 1966, PREDICTING READING F
[6]  
HOGG R, 1970, INTRO MATH STAT, P166
[7]   PREDICTION - A 6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
JANSKY, JJ ;
HOFFMAN, MJ ;
LAYTON, J ;
SUGAR, F ;
DAVIES, M .
ANNALS OF DYSLEXIA, 1989, 39 :227-246
[8]  
MAKUCH RW, 1989, STATISTICIAN, V38, P61
[9]   BINARY REGRESSION USING AN EXTENDED BETA-BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION, WITH DISCUSSION OF CORRELATION INDUCED BY COVARIATE MEASUREMENT ERRORS [J].
PRENTICE, RL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 81 (394) :321-327
[10]   CRITICAL MEASUREMENT ISSUES IN LEARNING-DISABILITIES [J].
REYNOLDS, CR .
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1984, 18 (04) :451-476