GOAL ORIENTATIONS AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE SPORT EXPERIENCE

被引:71
作者
LOCHBAUM, MR [1 ]
ROBERTS, GC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS,DEPT KINESIOL,URBANA,IL 61801
关键词
ACHIEVEMENT; EGO; TASK;
D O I
10.1123/jsep.15.2.160
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Nicholls's (1984a, 1984b, 1989) conceptual framework was used to study the relationship between two implicit goal orientations (task and ego) and achievement behaviors. This study examined the relationship between the goal orientations and (a) beliefs concerning determinants of success, (b) competition and practice strategies, (c) practice benefits, and (d) enjoyment. Subjects were 182 male and 114 female high school athletes who competed in at least one sport during the 1989-1990 school year. Factor analyses were conducted to determine the composition of the relevant factors. Ten factors emerged. Canonical analysis was employed to determine the relationship between goal orientations and the 10 subscales. The results, consistent with the hypotheses, showed that athletes with a task orientation focused on adaptive achievement strategies whereas athletes with an ego orientation focused on potentially maladaptive achievement strategies. The implications of the results to sport participation are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 171
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   ACHIEVEMENT GOALS IN THE CLASSROOM - STUDENTS LEARNING-STRATEGIES AND MOTIVATION PROCESSES [J].
AMES, C ;
ARCHER, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 80 (03) :260-267
[2]  
AMES C, 1992, MOTIVATION IN SPORT AND EXERCISE, P161
[3]  
AMES C, 1990, UNPUB LONGITUDINAL E
[4]  
AMES C, 1989, HOME SCH COOPERATION
[5]  
BOYD MP, 1990, THESIS U SO CALIFORN
[7]   THE RELATIONSHIP OF TASK AND EGO ORIENTATION TO SPORTSMANSHIP ATTITUDES AND THE PERCEIVED LEGITIMACY OF INJURIOUS ACTS [J].
DUDA, JL ;
OLSON, LK ;
TEMPLIN, TJ .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1991, 62 (01) :79-87
[8]  
DUDA JL, 1992, MOTIVATION IN SPORT AND EXERCISE, P57
[9]   DIMENSIONS OF ACHIEVEMENT-MOTIVATION IN SCHOOLWORK AND SPORT [J].
DUDA, JL ;
NICHOLLS, JG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :290-299