THE SMEAR LAYER - A PHENOMENON IN ROOT-CANAL THERAPY

被引:177
作者
SEN, BH
WESSELINK, PR
TURKUN, M
机构
[1] Department of Endodontics, Ege University, İzmir
[2] Department of Cariology and *Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam
关键词
BACTERIAL PENETRATION; MICROLEAKAGE; ROOT CANAL DISINFECTANTS; ROOT CANAL SEALERS; SMEAR LAYER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00289.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
When the root canals are instrumented during endodontic therapy, a layer of material composed of dentine, remnants of pulp tissue and odontoblastic processes, and sometimes bacteria, is always formed on the canal walls. This layer has been called the smear layer. It has an amorphous, irregular and granular appearance under the scanning electron microscope. The advantages and disadvantages of the prescence of smear layer, and whether it should be removed or not from the instrumented root canals, are still controversial. It has been shown that this layer is not a complete barrier to bacteria and it delays but does not abolish the action of endodontic disinfectants. Endodontic smear layer also acts as a physical barrier interfering with adhesion and penetration of sealers into dentinal tubules, in turn, it may affect the sealing efficiency of root canal obturation. When it is not removed, the durability of the apical and coronal seal should be evaluated over a long period. If smear layer is to be removed, EDTA and NaOCl solutions have been shown to be effective, among various irrigation solutions and techniques, including ultrasonics, that have been tested. Once this layer is removed, it should be borne in mind that there is a risk of reinfecting dentinal tubules if the seal fails. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical importance of the absence or presence of smear layer.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: An insight into the mechanisms involved, Journal of Endodontics, 13, pp. 93-101, (1987)
[2]  
Ahmad M, Pitt ford TR., Crum LA, Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: An Acoustic streaming and its possible role, Journal of Endodontics, 13, pp. 490-499, (1987)
[3]  
Akpata ES, Blechmak H, Bacterial invasion of pulpal dentin wall In vitro, Journal of Dental Research, 61, pp. 435-438, (1982)
[4]  
Aktener BO, Cengiz T., Piskin B, The penetration of smear material into dentinal tubules during instrumentation with surface active reagents: a scanning electron microscopic study, Journal of Endodontics, 15, pp. 588-590, (1989)
[5]  
Alacam T, Scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of endodontic irrigating systems, International Endodontic Journal, 20, pp. 287-294, (1987)
[6]  
Baker MC, Ashraft SH, van Cura JE, Remeikis NA, Ultrasonic compared with hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study, Journal of Endodontics, 14, pp. 435-442, (1988)
[7]  
Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S, Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions, Journal of Endodontics, 1, pp. 127-135, (1975)
[8]  
Barnes IE, The production of inlay cavity bevels, British Dental Journal, 137, pp. 379-390, (1974)
[9]  
Baumgartner JC, Brown CM, Mader CL., Peters DD, Shulman JD, A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal debriment using saline, sodium hypochlorite and citric acid, Journal of Endodontics, 10, pp. 525-531, (1984)
[10]  
Baemgartner JC, Mader CL, A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens, Journal of Endodontics, 13, pp. 147-157, (1987)