THE SMEAR LAYER - A PHENOMENON IN ROOT-CANAL THERAPY

被引:180
作者
SEN, BH
WESSELINK, PR
TURKUN, M
机构
[1] Department of Endodontics, Ege University, İzmir
[2] Department of Cariology and *Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam
关键词
BACTERIAL PENETRATION; MICROLEAKAGE; ROOT CANAL DISINFECTANTS; ROOT CANAL SEALERS; SMEAR LAYER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00289.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
When the root canals are instrumented during endodontic therapy, a layer of material composed of dentine, remnants of pulp tissue and odontoblastic processes, and sometimes bacteria, is always formed on the canal walls. This layer has been called the smear layer. It has an amorphous, irregular and granular appearance under the scanning electron microscope. The advantages and disadvantages of the prescence of smear layer, and whether it should be removed or not from the instrumented root canals, are still controversial. It has been shown that this layer is not a complete barrier to bacteria and it delays but does not abolish the action of endodontic disinfectants. Endodontic smear layer also acts as a physical barrier interfering with adhesion and penetration of sealers into dentinal tubules, in turn, it may affect the sealing efficiency of root canal obturation. When it is not removed, the durability of the apical and coronal seal should be evaluated over a long period. If smear layer is to be removed, EDTA and NaOCl solutions have been shown to be effective, among various irrigation solutions and techniques, including ultrasonics, that have been tested. Once this layer is removed, it should be borne in mind that there is a risk of reinfecting dentinal tubules if the seal fails. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical importance of the absence or presence of smear layer.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 91 条
[81]  
Safavi KE, Spangberg L, Langeland K, Smear layer removal effects on root canal dentine tubule infection, Journal of Endodontics, 15, (1989)
[82]  
Saunders WP, Saunders EM, The effect of smear layer upon the coronal leakage of gutta‐percha root fillings and a glass ionomer sealer, International Endodontic Journal, 25, pp. 245-249, (1992)
[83]  
Stewart GG, Kapsimalis P, Rappaport H, EDTA and urea peroxide for root canal preparation, Journal of American Dental Association, 78, pp. 335-338, (1969)
[84]  
Uitto VJ, Haapasalo M, Laakso T., Salo T, Degradation of basement membrane (Type IV) collagen by proteases from some anaerobic microorganisms, Oral Microbiology and Immunology, 3, pp. 97-102, (1988)
[85]  
Vojinovic O, Nyborgh H, Brannstrom M, Acid treatment of cavities under resin fillings: Bacterial growth in dentinal tubules and pulpal reactions, Journal of Dental Research, 52, pp. 1189-1193, (1973)
[86]  
Wayman BE, Kopp WM, Pinero GJ, Lazzari EP, Citric and lactic acids as root canal irrigants in vitro, Journal of Endodontics, 5, pp. 258-265, (1979)
[87]  
White RR., Goldman M, Lin P, The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by plastic filling materials, Journal of Endodontics, 10, pp. 558-562, (1984)
[88]  
White RR, Goldman M, Lin P, The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II, Journal of Endodontics, 13, pp. 369-374, (1987)
[89]  
Williams S, Goldman M, Penetrability of the smeared layer by a strain of Proteus vulgaris, Journal of Endodontics, 11, pp. 385-388, (1985)
[90]  
Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS, A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part III, Journal of Endodontics, 9, pp. 137-142, (1983)